incubator-graffito-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Christophe Lombart" <christophe.lomb...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Graffito status followup
Date Wed, 14 Feb 2007 13:44:43 GMT
On 2/14/07, Jukka Zitting <jukka.zitting@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2/14/07, Christophe Lombart <christophe.lombart@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Before starting the refactoring, I would like to be sure that
> > everybody is agreed. Can we summarize like this :
>
> +1, sounds good to me.
>
> > * Framework means a series of components/services that can be running
> > alone (or integrated into specific applications). The framework offers
> > also an integration with other existing frameworks/components.
>
> We might want to consider applying the OSGi component model in
> Graffito to help integration with other tools.
>

+1 . Let's talk later on that topic.

> There's a jcr-classloader component in Jackrabbit contribs that might
> come in handy.

ok I will review it.

>
> I'd also be interested in investigating options for content-to-object
> mappings as opposed to object-to-content mappings. I.e. could we
> automatically expose JCR content as Java objects (instead or in
> addition to JCR Nodes) to enable effortless integration with various
> JavaBean tools.

What do you mean by content-to-object mapping. Can give some use cases ?
The OCM tools is supporting both mapping I think no ?

Mime
View raw message