incubator-graffito-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Christophe Lombart" <christophe.lomb...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Why the Webdav-/Graffito-/FileSystemServer interfaces?
Date Sat, 02 Sep 2006 06:52:29 GMT
On 9/2/06, Edgar Poce <edgarpoce@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> There's only one drawback that comes to my mind: since the content
> will be touched from many places all the constraints and security
> policies should be handled at the repository level in order to
> guarantee data integrity. That would probably lead to extend the
> repository constraint functionality through decoration or whatever
> strategy.
>
> WDYT? has it any sense?.

of course

Anyway, I'm working on the wysiwyg jcr
> portlet to show how a porlet "content" mode would look, I'll share it
> asap.
>

ok

>
>                       -----------------------
>                             gft modules
>                       -----------------------
>                             gft services
>       --------------  -----------------------
>        jcr portlets   gft persistence service
>       ----------------------------------------
> webdav |->   jcr      | rdbms | fs | webdav
> cifs   |
> nfs    |
> ldap   |
> etc.
>

What is jcr portlets, I think it is JCR service or something like that no ?
eg. portlet JCR admin browser -> jcr service -> One of the referenced
JCR server.

Mime
View raw message