From graffito-dev-return-1165-apmail-incubator-graffito-dev-archive=www.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Fri Jul 21 08:38:15 2006 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-graffito-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 35968 invoked from network); 21 Jul 2006 08:38:14 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 21 Jul 2006 08:38:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 82709 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jul 2006 08:38:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact graffito-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: graffito-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list graffito-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 82694 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jul 2006 08:38:13 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Jul 2006 01:38:13 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of christophe.lombart@gmail.com designates 64.233.182.190 as permitted sender) Received: from [64.233.182.190] (HELO nf-out-0910.google.com) (64.233.182.190) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Jul 2006 01:38:12 -0700 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id x4so824563nfb for ; Fri, 21 Jul 2006 01:37:51 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=npX8xU1AsNq4axDOivcOi9lK+zDEPTnEHCT1VWfvPqI+y+Yv6XfEsh3GlWhGCor/RxJDHc5lr2qZrZzO+j1eATmLesDAei1hOOuk0+UPrAcSb8+c/m552LMKuTWTVsWLoxieJvuPZaxEkSWBd/YtlzracV3DnfhLjXUpmnM4KpM= Received: by 10.78.117.10 with SMTP id p10mr205207huc; Fri, 21 Jul 2006 01:37:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.78.158.2 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Jul 2006 01:37:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3b728ee90607210137q521f3a3gd3cb38af2696372c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 10:37:51 +0200 From: "Christophe Lombart" To: graffito-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Why the Webdav-/Graffito-/FileSystemServer interfaces? In-Reply-To: <510143ac0607201822y6fea5b3bp760c2e8f7084263b@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_126866_3590914.1153471071484" References: <510143ac0607201611l25fc3ebel4f21d9e58e345ac5@mail.gmail.com> <510143ac0607201822y6fea5b3bp760c2e8f7084263b@mail.gmail.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N ------=_Part_126866_3590914.1153471071484 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On 7/21/06, Jukka Zitting wrote: > > Hi, > > On 7/21/06, Jukka Zitting wrote: > > Going deeper into the graffito-api project I started wondering why it > > contains the Webdav-, Graffito- and FileSystemServer interfaces? > > I traced the use of the Server interface back to just providing > configuration interface to the appropriate Store implementation. Is it > the intention that Server instances are just carriers of configuration > parameters? Right - There are simple data objects to store connection & setting parameters. I'm on vacation today but next week I will review your jira issues and commit your patches. Thanks for your help Christophe BR, > > Jukka Zitting > > -- > Yukatan - http://yukatan.fi/ - info@yukatan.fi > Software craftsmanship, JCR consulting, and Java development > -- Best regards, Christophe ------=_Part_126866_3590914.1153471071484--