incubator-graffito-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Christophe Lombart <>
Subject Re: Mappings - components and spread objects
Date Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:17:42 GMT
Hi Alex,

I'm also interesting by this kind of features. Here are my comments.
On 1/12/06, Alexandru Popescu <> wrote:
> Hi!
> I've started thinking about possible extension of the current
> supported mapping strategies. The directions I am investigating right
> now are including:
> - component mapping

ok what about the following issue :

> - relations
Can you give more info. What kind of relations ? Are you speaking
about object associations ?

> - inheritance

... and interface. It should be nice to make query based on interface
and of course ancestor class.

> - spreaded

Can you give more info ?
> So far (and indeed the easiest one) are the component mappings: they
> allow mapping the properties of a child object to the properties of
> the current working node. In the JCR world, a very good example of
> this are the mixins. Introducing a mixin to a node may add a set of
> properties that the user can manipulate with the help of a single
> entity.
> Such an entity doesn't have any restrictions upon it (no path
> required, as it doesn't live by itself, no limitation in children,
> anything).
> Please let me know what do you think about this.
> In the future episodes I will try to address the remaining areas.
> cheers,
> ./alex
> --
> .w( the_mindstorm )p.

Best regards,


View raw message