From graffito-dev-return-386-apmail-incubator-graffito-dev-archive=www.apache.org@incubator.apache.org Tue Aug 02 21:34:56 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-graffito-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 37413 invoked from network); 2 Aug 2005 21:34:56 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Aug 2005 21:34:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 67089 invoked by uid 500); 2 Aug 2005 21:34:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact graffito-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: graffito-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list graffito-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 67076 invoked by uid 99); 2 Aug 2005 21:34:55 -0000 Received: from asf.osuosl.org (HELO asf.osuosl.org) (140.211.166.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Aug 2005 14:34:55 -0700 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (asf.osuosl.org: domain of sandro.boehme@gmx.de designates 213.165.64.20 as permitted sender) Received: from [213.165.64.20] (HELO mail.gmx.net) (213.165.64.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 02 Aug 2005 14:34:47 -0700 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 02 Aug 2005 21:34:53 -0000 Received: from p54A3C559.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO [192.168.2.2]) [84.163.197.89] by mail.gmx.net (mp016) with SMTP; 02 Aug 2005 23:34:53 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1646957 Message-ID: <42EFE7B6.6090801@gmx.de> Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 23:37:58 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Sandro_B=F6hme?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: graffito-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [jcr-mapping] persistence of the mapping model References: <42E959B2.5030302@gmx.de> <3b728ee9050731134776c1cb62@mail.gmail.com> <42ED4ABD.8090109@gmx.de> <42EFAC51.2020104@gmx.de> <3b728ee90508021119215fd88a@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <3b728ee90508021119215fd88a@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N Christophe Lombart wrote: >+0 because I think tools like Digester is so simple to use in such case. >Please, make a small document on the xml schema to use for the mapping. > >Christophe. > > Do I understand it right, that you vote +0 for XML-schema and Digester is simple to use with XML-schema? What should the document contain? Sandro > >2005/8/2, Oliver Kiessler : > > >>>Regarding XML-schema: >>>I think we will need a definition for the XML file somehow or other. Be >>>it in writing form, a DTD or a >>>XML-schema. The schema is the more advanced than DTD. The user will have >>>a valid XML file as >>>early as possible. I think the writing form of explaining the definition >>>is much more work if it has the same >>>quality as the schema. >>> >>>I think we need a XML-schema ballot in order to be able to close the >>>ballot about the persistence >>>technology of the mapping model. >>> >>>++ Please vote if you think we need a XML schema for the XML file of the >>>mapping model. ++ >>> >>> >>ok. I think you have a point here, therefore I vote +1. >> >>oliver >> >> >> > > > >