incubator-graffito-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sandro Böhme <sandro.boe...@gmx.de>
Subject Re: JCR-Mapping VOTE : All commiters has to vote - Thanks
Date Wed, 24 Aug 2005 07:28:21 GMT
I hope that I can commit something at the weekend.
What did you not understand Christophe? It would be too bad if I write 
something
to no purpose.

Sandro

Christophe Lombart wrote:

>Sandro, I don't understand you.
>The proposal #3 is to show the difference between an XMLBeans (or
>similar tools) and Digester, BeanUtil implementation - no ?
>
>Christophe 
>
>
>2005/8/22, Sandro Böhme <sandro.boehme@gmx.de>:
>  
>
>>So I guess, you are not +1 for the XML schema. Because in that case I
>>wouldn't need
>>to go into the details of XMLBeans.
>>
>>Sandro
>>
>>Christophe Lombart wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Ok so let's go for the proposal #3. At least, we are agree on the
>>>components organisations. That's maybe the more important. It should
>>>be nice if you can commit your code in a branch.
>>>
>>>Tomorrow, I'm going to commit new stuffs and I would like to send a
>>>mail on the Jackrabbit mailing list in order to find more interested
>>>guys.
>>>
>>>Christophe
>>>
>>>2005/8/22, Sandro Böhme <sandro.boehme@gmx.de>:
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>Hi Christophe,
>>>>
>>>>in my email from the 6.8. I wrote:
>>>>"+1 for 3. I'm not sure if it is needed to check my prototype in.
>>>>But for me it's more about finding good arguments and consensus.
>>>>That would lead to a situation where everybody is willing to support the
>>>>way to go instead of
>>>>having one who is overruled and don't really understands why."
>>>>
>>>>And in a later email:
>>>>"Hello Christophe,
>>>>
>>>>if you are back from vacation and read my arguments and you are +1 for
>>>>Digester anyway, I'm
>>>>+0 for Digester for not slowing down the project. Basically because it
>>>>is only a matter of work
>>>>to keep the XML file specification in sync with the mapping class model
>>>>and it will not have
>>>>any impact to the user.
>>>>
>>>>But at the moment I don't see any arguments contra XML schema."
>>>>
>>>>regards,
>>>>
>>>>Sandro
>>>>
>>>>Christophe Lombart wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>>>Hi All,
>>>>>
>>>>>If I follow this thread, here is the result :
>>>>>
>>>>>proposal #3 : David, Oliver and myself.
>>>>>Sandro ?
>>>>>
>>>>>Christophe
>>>>>
>>>>>2005/8/11, Oliver Kiessler <oliver.kiessler@gmail.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>          
>>>>>
>>>>>>>I afraid with my simple mind I did not completely understand why
the
>>>>>>>user has to deal with the java classes generated
>>>>>>>by XML beans. Do you mean something like a GUI that creates the
mapping
>>>>>>>xml file?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>              
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>yes, a GUI is one example (also ant tasks, maven etc.). Instead of
>>>>>>having to write mappings by hand, one could generate them (by using
>>>>>>java classes). I think XML Beans makes it really easy to create
>>>>>>individual mappings.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>oliver
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>            
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>          
>>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>    
>>
>
>
>  
>


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message