incubator-graffito-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sandro Böhme <sandro.boe...@gmx.de>
Subject Re: JCR-Mapping VOTE : All commiters has to vote - Thanks
Date Mon, 22 Aug 2005 20:56:46 GMT
So I guess, you are not +1 for the XML schema. Because in that case I 
wouldn't need
to go into the details of XMLBeans.

Sandro

Christophe Lombart wrote:

>Ok so let's go for the proposal #3. At least, we are agree on the
>components organisations. That's maybe the more important. It should
>be nice if you can commit your code in a branch.
>
>Tomorrow, I'm going to commit new stuffs and I would like to send a
>mail on the Jackrabbit mailing list in order to find more interested
>guys.
>
>Christophe 
>
>2005/8/22, Sandro Böhme <sandro.boehme@gmx.de>:
>  
>
>>Hi Christophe,
>>
>>in my email from the 6.8. I wrote:
>>"+1 for 3. I'm not sure if it is needed to check my prototype in.
>>But for me it's more about finding good arguments and consensus.
>>That would lead to a situation where everybody is willing to support the
>>way to go instead of
>>having one who is overruled and don't really understands why."
>>
>>And in a later email:
>>"Hello Christophe,
>>
>>if you are back from vacation and read my arguments and you are +1 for
>>Digester anyway, I'm
>>+0 for Digester for not slowing down the project. Basically because it
>>is only a matter of work
>>to keep the XML file specification in sync with the mapping class model
>>and it will not have
>>any impact to the user.
>>
>>But at the moment I don't see any arguments contra XML schema."
>>
>>regards,
>>
>>Sandro
>>
>>Christophe Lombart wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Hi All,
>>>
>>>If I follow this thread, here is the result :
>>>
>>>proposal #3 : David, Oliver and myself.
>>>Sandro ?
>>>
>>>Christophe
>>>
>>>2005/8/11, Oliver Kiessler <oliver.kiessler@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>>I afraid with my simple mind I did not completely understand why the
>>>>>user has to deal with the java classes generated
>>>>>by XML beans. Do you mean something like a GUI that creates the mapping
>>>>>xml file?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>          
>>>>>
>>>>yes, a GUI is one example (also ant tasks, maven etc.). Instead of
>>>>having to write mappings by hand, one could generate them (by using
>>>>java classes). I think XML Beans makes it really easy to create
>>>>individual mappings.
>>>>
>>>>oliver
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>    
>>
>
>
>  
>


Mime
View raw message