incubator-graffito-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Christophe Lombart <christophe.lomb...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: JCR-Mapping VOTE : All commiters has to vote - Thanks
Date Tue, 23 Aug 2005 05:54:49 GMT
Sandro, I don't understand you.
The proposal #3 is to show the difference between an XMLBeans (or
similar tools) and Digester, BeanUtil implementation - no ?

Christophe 


2005/8/22, Sandro Böhme <sandro.boehme@gmx.de>:
> So I guess, you are not +1 for the XML schema. Because in that case I
> wouldn't need
> to go into the details of XMLBeans.
> 
> Sandro
> 
> Christophe Lombart wrote:
> 
> >Ok so let's go for the proposal #3. At least, we are agree on the
> >components organisations. That's maybe the more important. It should
> >be nice if you can commit your code in a branch.
> >
> >Tomorrow, I'm going to commit new stuffs and I would like to send a
> >mail on the Jackrabbit mailing list in order to find more interested
> >guys.
> >
> >Christophe
> >
> >2005/8/22, Sandro Böhme <sandro.boehme@gmx.de>:
> >
> >
> >>Hi Christophe,
> >>
> >>in my email from the 6.8. I wrote:
> >>"+1 for 3. I'm not sure if it is needed to check my prototype in.
> >>But for me it's more about finding good arguments and consensus.
> >>That would lead to a situation where everybody is willing to support the
> >>way to go instead of
> >>having one who is overruled and don't really understands why."
> >>
> >>And in a later email:
> >>"Hello Christophe,
> >>
> >>if you are back from vacation and read my arguments and you are +1 for
> >>Digester anyway, I'm
> >>+0 for Digester for not slowing down the project. Basically because it
> >>is only a matter of work
> >>to keep the XML file specification in sync with the mapping class model
> >>and it will not have
> >>any impact to the user.
> >>
> >>But at the moment I don't see any arguments contra XML schema."
> >>
> >>regards,
> >>
> >>Sandro
> >>
> >>Christophe Lombart wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>Hi All,
> >>>
> >>>If I follow this thread, here is the result :
> >>>
> >>>proposal #3 : David, Oliver and myself.
> >>>Sandro ?
> >>>
> >>>Christophe
> >>>
> >>>2005/8/11, Oliver Kiessler <oliver.kiessler@gmail.com>:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>I afraid with my simple mind I did not completely understand why
the
> >>>>>user has to deal with the java classes generated
> >>>>>by XML beans. Do you mean something like a GUI that creates the mapping
> >>>>>xml file?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>yes, a GUI is one example (also ant tasks, maven etc.). Instead of
> >>>>having to write mappings by hand, one could generate them (by using
> >>>>java classes). I think XML Beans makes it really easy to create
> >>>>individual mappings.
> >>>>
> >>>>oliver
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
>

Mime
View raw message