incubator-graffito-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Christophe Lombart <christophe.lomb...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [jcr-mapping] persistence of the mapping model
Date Mon, 01 Aug 2005 07:15:11 GMT
+1 only for Digester. I think XML Schema is not necessary for a confi file. 
it should quite stable. I see only new elements used new features. 

Christophe


2005/8/1, Sandro Böhme <sandro.boehme@gmx.de>:
> Christophe Lombart wrote:
> 
> >>+1 for Digester if you don't need XML Schema support, +1 for XMLBeans
> >>if we need it
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >+1
> >
> >
> >
> Do you vote +1 for both, Digester and XML Beans also dependent on the
> Schema support?
> 
> What do you both think about the exchangability of the library?
> 
> >>I think we don't necessarily need XML Schema support because I believe
> >> the mapping config xml file will not change very often (maybe during
> >> development...)
> 
> >Same opinion
> I'm not sure if the mapping specification is really stable or if it will
> get stable quite fast.
> 
> Pro XML-schema:
> o Easier to keep the allowed XML structure in sync with the mapping model.
> o The user can validate their XML file with the XML schema and we don't need
> very much error handling in the application. I assume that XML schema can
> validate more than Digester can because the schema knows the types, structure
> and cardinality <se?lp=ende&p=/Mn4k.&search=cardinality>. But I don't know
very much about digester, so I could be
> wrong.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Sandro
> 
>

Mime
View raw message