Mailing-List: contact gora-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: gora-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=getopt.org; h=message-id:date
	:from:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=getopt.org; b=
	Fos1VCwtxA3yv9dZQiV59pqn2xeW6vwic2gG7NkVdht0uSaJ0Hk4PKYGhhARkpOQ
	S7evgBBD2xupBW/d8j+DArone55W8ZyU/r33bWI8h8/IP04FM2/3Lk+z11WljgAV
	NXnUHcNtG5SRn0nGxgsd81JvE9srukDUlp4ON9Mk6to=
Message-ID: <4F21CCBE.5000705@getopt.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 22:59:26 +0100
From: Andrzej Bialecki <ab@getopt.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7;
 rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gora-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Strategy moving towards Gora 0.2 release
References: 
 <CAGaRif3gs7OLgSWeT7VZMYUF5LYL3pa59zeFnbLFS0ZL5RVQvw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAGaRif3gs7OLgSWeT7VZMYUF5LYL3pa59zeFnbLFS0ZL5RVQvw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 26/01/2012 13:16, Lewis John Mcgibbney wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> I wanted to wait until we heard back from the board regarding graduation
> before passing this one off.
>
> What are the general feelings about preparing for a 0.2 release?
>
> I would like to view the following
>
> 1) Currently there are 16 open issues for the 0.2-incubating release [1],
> of these there don't appear to be any major bugs, however there are some
> which I think should definitely be addressed such as adding Cassandra
> tests, getting the new website and accompanying datastore specific
> documentation resolved, as well as the licensing issues with the sqlbuilder
> dependency (possible rewrite of gora-sql to support JOOQ).
> 2) It would be absolutely great if we could get the gora-solr store (nearly
> there pending review and tests passing), and the gora-accumulo store
> (nearly there pending review) integrated as this would give us an
> oppertunity to open Gora up to two other communities, hopefully driving on
> development between 0.2 release and 0.3 release phase.

I'm interested in pushing forward gora-solr. I believe that with the 
recent developments in Solr (SolrCloud has just been committed to trunk) 
this backend + Nutch Gora could offer a convenient, mostly 
single-technology, combined crawl/store/search platform.

The issues with gora-solr tests were related to unclear semantics of 
some operations. I know there has been some progress on this since that 
patch was created, so I'd like to bring it up to date (using Solr trunk).

-- 
Best regards,
Andrzej Bialecki     <><
  ___. ___ ___ ___ _ _   __________________________________
[__ || __|__/|__||\/|  Information Retrieval, Semantic Web
___|||__||  \|  ||  |  Embedded Unix, System Integration
http://www.sigram.com  Contact: info at sigram dot com