Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-giraph-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-giraph-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 705299D64 for ; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 15:46:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 59191 invoked by uid 500); 3 Feb 2012 15:46:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-giraph-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 59139 invoked by uid 500); 3 Feb 2012 15:46:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact giraph-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: giraph-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list giraph-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 59131 invoked by uid 99); 3 Feb 2012 15:46:31 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 15:46:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of harsh@cloudera.com designates 209.85.210.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.47] (HELO mail-pz0-f47.google.com) (209.85.210.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 15:46:27 +0000 Received: by daln34 with SMTP id n34so315599dal.6 for ; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 07:46:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.68.216.227 with SMTP id ot3mr18795072pbc.18.1328283967168; Fri, 03 Feb 2012 07:46:07 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.72.17 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 07:45:47 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Harsh J Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 21:15:47 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Giraph 0.1-incubating (rc0) To: giraph-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable +1 (non binding). I downloaded, compiled and ran a couple of algorithms and the total set of 58 tests successfully. On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 8:42 PM, Jake Mannix wrote: > +1 for the source release from me. > > > On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 9:03 PM, Hyunsik Choi wrote: > >> I also checked the compile, all tests pass, gpg sign, and md5 sign. >> >> +1 for both the source release and the binary tarball release. >> -- >> Hyunsik Choi >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 8:36 AM, Jakob Homan wrote: >> >> > Giraphers- >> > I've created a candidate for our first release. It's a source release >> > without a binary for two reasons: first, there's still discussion >> > going on about what needs to be done for the NOTICE and LICENSE files >> > for projects that bring in transitive dependencies to the binary >> > release ( >> > http://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg32693.html= ) >> > and second because we're still munging our binary against three types >> > of Hadoop, which would mean we'd need to release three different >> > binary artifacts, which seems suboptimal. =A0Hopefully both of these >> > issues will be addressed by 0.2. >> > >> > I've tested the release against an unsecure 20.2 cluster. =A0It'd be >> > great to test it against other configurations. =A0Note that we're voti= ng >> > on the tag; the files are provided as a convenience. >> > >> > Release notes: >> > >> http://people.apache.org/~jghoman/giraph-0.1.0-incubating-rc0/RELEASE_NO= TES.html >> > >> > Release artifacts: >> > http://people.apache.org/~jghoman/giraph-0.1.0-incubating-rc0/ >> > >> > Corresponding svn tag: >> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/giraph/tags/release-0.1-rc0/ >> > >> > Our signing keys (my key doesn't seem to be being picked up by >> > http://people.apache.org/keys/group/giraph.asc): >> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/giraph/KEYS >> > >> > The vote runs for 72 hours, until Friday 4pm PST. =A0After a successfu= l >> > vote here, Incubator will vote on the release as well. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Jakob >> > >> --=20 Harsh J Customer Ops. Engineer Cloudera | http://tiny.cloudera.com/about