Mailing-List: contact giraph-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: giraph-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of claudio.martella@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.210.175 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAOcnVr39ddUOggMk8hparKH1BJ2Z_p1B2W2GEo59ttUjxT2RVQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CADiKvVtY05ehL5Y2Wv+x9VBYdBg_DgqUgoAL_YbixvhbnVb=Uw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAM=XDd83kkcr2JJGerw03fQKK8_newZn1scr0TU8DJE1_gti1w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CACYXym8dQktURwR_N7t8GmX-A2k7r+ouzqAt89u7fbPSCN_KHw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOcnVr39ddUOggMk8hparKH1BJ2Z_p1B2W2GEo59ttUjxT2RVQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Claudio Martella <claudio.martella@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 17:01:33 +0100
Message-ID: 
 <CAFJOoJcPuaTejVvXH-vii7xtUcHLu+m9DBVy07Mu507tW8t6vQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Giraph 0.1-incubating (rc0)
To: giraph-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

+1, I tested it on hadoop 1.0 and it passes tests.

On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Harsh J <harsh@cloudera.com> wrote:
> +1 (non binding). I downloaded, compiled and ran a couple of
> algorithms and the total set of 58 tests successfully.
>
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 8:42 PM, Jake Mannix <jake.mannix@gmail.com> wrote=
:
>> +1 for the source release from me.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 9:03 PM, Hyunsik Choi <hyunsik@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> I also checked the compile, all tests pass, gpg sign, and md5 sign.
>>>
>>> +1 for both the source release and the binary tarball release.
>>> --
>>> Hyunsik Choi
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 8:36 AM, Jakob Homan <jghoman@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Giraphers-
>>> > I've created a candidate for our first release. It's a source release
>>> > without a binary for two reasons: first, there's still discussion
>>> > going on about what needs to be done for the NOTICE and LICENSE files
>>> > for projects that bring in transitive dependencies to the binary
>>> > release (
>>> > http://www.mail-archive.com/general@incubator.apache.org/msg32693.htm=
l)
>>> > and second because we're still munging our binary against three types
>>> > of Hadoop, which would mean we'd need to release three different
>>> > binary artifacts, which seems suboptimal. =A0Hopefully both of these
>>> > issues will be addressed by 0.2.
>>> >
>>> > I've tested the release against an unsecure 20.2 cluster. =A0It'd be
>>> > great to test it against other configurations. =A0Note that we're vot=
ing
>>> > on the tag; the files are provided as a convenience.
>>> >
>>> > Release notes:
>>> >
>>> http://people.apache.org/~jghoman/giraph-0.1.0-incubating-rc0/RELEASE_N=
OTES.html
>>> >
>>> > Release artifacts:
>>> > http://people.apache.org/~jghoman/giraph-0.1.0-incubating-rc0/
>>> >
>>> > Corresponding svn tag:
>>> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/giraph/tags/release-0.1-rc0=
/
>>> >
>>> > Our signing keys (my key doesn't seem to be being picked up by
>>> > http://people.apache.org/keys/group/giraph.asc):
>>> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/giraph/KEYS
>>> >
>>> > The vote runs for 72 hours, until Friday 4pm PST. =A0After a successf=
ul
>>> > vote here, Incubator will vote on the release as well.
>>> >
>>> > Thanks,
>>> > Jakob
>>> >
>>>
>
>
>
> --
> Harsh J
> Customer Ops. Engineer
> Cloudera | http://tiny.cloudera.com/about


--=20
=A0 =A0Claudio Martella
=A0 =A0claudio.martella@gmail.com