incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Training (incubating) Proposal
Date Fri, 08 Feb 2019 11:52:21 GMT
Sign me up (

Am 08.02.19, 11:55 schrieb "Lars Francke" <lars.francke@gmail.com>:

    One more thing: We've got three mentors. If anyone else would like to
    volunteer we won't say no :)
    
    I've used the E-Mail addresses from your mails in the proposal. Feel free
    to update to an @apache.org address if you want to.
    
    On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 11:05 AM Lars Francke <lars.francke@gmail.com> wrote:
    
    > Thanks to the three of you.
    >
    > Those arguments make sense to me and we indeed have a few "newcomers" with
    > us (that includes me in a non-committer role) so I've changed my opinion
    > and think the Incubator way would be the best.
    >
    > I'll edit the Wiki proposal (and add Christofer whom I've forgotten,
    > sorry!) to indicate this.
    >
    > If there are no other comments or concerns about anything we've written in
    > the proposal I would "close" this discussion soon and start a vote early
    > next week.
    >
    > Cheers,
    > Lars
    >
    > (as a heads up: I might be slow to respond next week due to limited
    > connectivity but we're in no rush as far as I'm concerned)
    >
    > On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 10:53 AM Myrle Krantz <myrle@apache.org> wrote:
    >
    >> My initial thought was: this should go straight to TLP: Training should be
    >> done by people who know what they're training about: whether it be the
    >> Apache Way or a specific project.  All the committers will likely be
    >> people
    >> who've at least reached committer status in a project, and most of them
    >> will probably be ASF members.
    >>
    >> But then I thought again: developing effective materials will require
    >> contact to the users of those materials.  What better place to find people
    >> to QA training materials and approaches than in the incubator?  I think a
    >> training project would benefit from incubator participation in a different
    >> manner than most projects do, but I do think starting in the incubator
    >> (and
    >> possibly, after discussion, even staying there) might be a good approach
    >> for this project.
    >>
    >> Best Regards,
    >> Myrle
    >>
    >> On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 10:34 AM Sönke Liebau
    >> <soenke.liebau@opencore.com.invalid> wrote:
    >>
    >> > Hi,
    >> >
    >> > after spending some time thinking about this I also tend towards the
    >> > Incubator route as I am sure this will help build and grow an active
    >> > community and processes.
    >> >
    >> > Best regards,
    >> > Sönke
    >> >
    >> > On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 6:38 AM Justin Mclean <justin@classsoftware.com>
    >> > wrote:
    >> > >
    >> > > Hi,
    >> > >
    >> > > > discussion seems to have died down. Before moving on I'd really
    >> like to
    >> > > > hear the opinions of the interested contributors on which direction
    >> to
    >> > go.
    >> > > > Otherwise we might have to put it to a vote?
    >> > >
    >> > > Perhaps I biased, but I think going via the incubator is alway
    >> helpful.
    >> > :-) The big question is would the board support the project going
    >> straight
    >> > to TLP? I really don’t know, it’s approved them in the past and not
    >> > rejected any that I know of. What could the project do to show the board
    >> > that going straight to TLP is justifiable? Perhaps start by list out how
    >> > many ASF members you have on the project and and give an idea of how
    >> long
    >> > they been around, how many projects they gone through incubation with
    >> and
    >> > how active they are in the incubator and may help you decide which path
    >> to
    >> > go and give the board some reassurance.
    >> > >
    >> > > Thanks,
    >> > > Justin
    >> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
    >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
    >> > >
    >> >
    >> >
    >> > --
    >> > Sönke Liebau
    >> > Partner
    >> > Tel. +49 179 7940878
    >> > OpenCore GmbH & Co. KG - Thomas-Mann-Straße 8 - 22880 Wedel - Germany
    >> >
    >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
    >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
    >> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
    >> >
    >> >
    >>
    >
    


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Mime
View raw message