From general-return-66189-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@incubator.apache.org Thu Oct 25 12:40:15 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id AED90180670 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 12:40:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 7768 invoked by uid 500); 25 Oct 2018 10:40:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 7751 invoked by uid 99); 25 Oct 2018 10:40:07 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 10:40:07 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 4B06AC1E04 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 10:40:07 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.889 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.889 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qPHjSN7PBAWQ for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 10:40:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-it1-f175.google.com (mail-it1-f175.google.com [209.85.166.175]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 3D0C85F4ED for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 10:40:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-it1-f175.google.com with SMTP id m15so1108301itl.4 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 03:40:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=LqfffftdjHjQsDwgAORlsm+HM5+Rw9ECneqfRMn7CDU=; b=JxDTEkZ6AR+dfYvPqmtTiY/FynoVVtklcV7Jg+Os4y21gRvDvQNisZ8cD0ev2Af03k GxGraqeqP0sLAlqcjI8teGqGAc9bcR5YUW4Y5aQeBKmQ82/Das3+HuiG/n70u2KT7u89 DxHN+h4uBz6n0DCZ1dxoZGM5KmzjY1MWE5NFaEWSFJHKnXkbpZldPu4jMBjrDJyCq51s 4AP7vICV6xTsaXO6pVvwki7Hh0smw9OsJWwYkQd/L/ClyRwQzrnDPVfjD8b0BCh8b/Zl DFr3JfNnm2GKUCqvDf9nilTUH308BeJip9C5NmCIMypOHUyGPAdTw5YICLUCaq8ULKb/ oxLA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=LqfffftdjHjQsDwgAORlsm+HM5+Rw9ECneqfRMn7CDU=; b=OyiCgkeRbMvgCq3+x6kxZjnkh/ZaHCEDUUA4p93yOBHiXOLZ8DKoY4okYzKIWqzf/s 3kF82y7wDPAjjYxYei0oB/E8pprl2uWydRxelB+qDJBvM16MBJV0L5P2keiUHQ8oGjFq sDEsok6xQYnLab2RH+KJr/UCVDvEzaFFhnqT0QHsCZAPu8+P8RPDJr2h34F5UgtfCDr9 OGutTZw1H8A9jeSkaYgMqoO3FDIb1VOIXEV/FGebqnidc0FjZC/NJeM7br6Ys8rKF3A9 6Zc1bIjCkDSD+IE56uk16O6YMTZ/Kwkmo5P9dmw1Kkwr5ooEta9n//SBTvDwgRg+MEm6 20+A== X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gIOJxSnkgvhNOHBbYek8vCwzGzgUv53h+qeimt60HL17cWQmXhV sQnJtQrP1Vf41eMD6glXf/mIU+McyIWiD4UHdBJgAA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5fc2H4adTfYgBeAlt9R/ztmvRrExcOrVaZlxcZ3jXrPloGp9UbT8ACNNF0DNaYKUJlokUm+jm6TyoI+kuT3vko= X-Received: by 2002:a24:3dd2:: with SMTP id n201-v6mr579790itn.67.1540464005125; Thu, 25 Oct 2018 03:40:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <3433FB52-BCA4-409C-8E6E-3CAFAE19D2CB@apache.org> In-Reply-To: From: Greg Stein Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 05:39:52 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: How to review so-called "binary releases"? To: general@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d09a7e05790b39f9" --000000000000d09a7e05790b39f9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Those are "convenience binaries" ... not "binary releases". On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 2:25 AM Luciano Resende wrote: > While I agree that binary artifacts are for convenience purposes, if one > searches our dist folder they will find lots of projects with binary > releases. > > When reviewing binary archives we need to make sure that the license file > is updated with the shiped dependencies licenses appropriately and that > they are all compatible with the Apache License (notice file might also > need to be updated). > > > On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 05:38 Greg Stein wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 10:25 PM Julian Hyde wrote: > > >... > > > > > As a reviewer, how am I to vote on this release candidate? > > > > > > You do NOT vote on binary artifacts. Since you cannot release binaries, > you > > should not put the Foundation's imprimatur on those artifacts (and as PMC > > Member, that is what your vote represents). > > > > > > > Should I vote -1 because the RC contains binaries? > > > > > > Vote on the source artifacts only. Clarify that your vote does not apply > to > > the binaries. > > > > Cheers, > > -g > > > -- > Sent from my Mobile device > --000000000000d09a7e05790b39f9--