incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "吴晟 Sheng Wu" <wu.sh...@foxmail.com>
Subject Re: [PROPOSAL] SkyWalking - proposal for Apache Incubation
Date Mon, 04 Dec 2017 12:03:30 GMT
Hi John,


Thanks for your explanation. I think ICLAs of all contributors are enough for SkyWalking.


------------------
Sheng Wu
SkyWalking


 




------------------ Original ------------------
From:  "John D. Ament";<johndament@apache.org>;
Date:  Mon, Dec 4, 2017 07:54 PM
To:  "general"<general@incubator.apache.org>;

Subject:  Re: [PROPOSAL] SkyWalking - proposal for Apache Incubation



On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 6:49 AM 吴晟 Sheng Wu <wu.sheng@foxmail.com> wrote:

> >  - I do not think the organization is a legal entity registered
> > anywhere. (Sheng?)
>
> Hi, John
>
>
> OpenSkywalking is only a GitHub organization. All our contributors has
> voted to let me sign the SGA, if this is allowed by ASF.
> Also, all of contributors shall sign the ICLA.
>

Please note that SGAs are not always required (SGAs are for the case when
the code is not Apache licensed and owned by someone else).  ICLAs are
always required.  Since the code is already Apache licensed, assuming we're
going to receive ICLAs from all of the individuals mentioned at
https://github.com/OpenSkywalking/skywalking/graphs/contributors then I
would strongly recommend you go that route.


>
>
> ------------------
> Sheng Wu
> SkyWalking
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------ Original ------------------
> From:  "mck";<mck@apache.org>;
> Date:  Mon, Dec 4, 2017 07:37 PM
> To:  "general"<general@incubator.apache.org>;
>
> Subject:  Re: [PROPOSAL] SkyWalking - proposal for Apache Incubation
>
>
>
>
> > > > > = Proposal =
> > > > > The goal of this proposal is to bring the existing Skywalking
> > > > > https://github.com/OpenSkywalking/skywalking codebase and existing
> > > > > developers and community into the Apache Software Foundation (ASF)
> in
> > > > > order to build a global, diverse and self-governed open source
> > > community
> > > > > in APM field.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Who owns this code? Will an SGA be provided, or ICLAs from
> contributors?
> > > > If ICLAs, are there any of the current 16 contributors who will not
> > > > provide an ICLA?
> > >
> > >
> > > I gone through this wil Sheng. An SGA will be provided as well as an
> > > ICLA from contributors.
> > > Sheng will bring this up with the community and seek confirmation from
> > > all the committors there, including that he shall be the representative
> > > of the 'OpenSkywalking Organization' to sign the SGA.
> > >
> >
> >
> > Sorry, just saw this.
> >
> > I don't believe that is correct.  Is the organization a legal entity?  I
> > would strongly recommend going the ICLA route.  Do all files in the
> > repository have the copyright claim "Copyright 2017, OpenSkywalking
> > Organization All rights reserved." ?
> >
>
>
>  - I do not think the organization is a legal entity registered
>  anywhere. (Sheng?)
>  - The following vote was performed in the community to provide some (ad
>  hoc) formalisation of the organization and Sheng's ability to sign for
>  it. https://github.com/OpenSkywalking/Organization/issues/14
>  - All files have the copyright claim "Copyright 2017, OpenSkywalking
>  Organization All rights reserved." (there's a few exceptions at the top
>  level, but as is normal for what i see in apache projects…)
>  - It's planned that all the contributors shall sign and submit an ICLA,
>  in addition to Sheng signing and submitting the SGA.
>
> Will this suffice John?
>
> regards,
> Mick
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, 8-Bit, 0 bytes)
View raw message