incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: ZeroMQ licensing in Apache MXNet
Date Thu, 06 Jul 2017 16:08:05 GMT
I think that the goals are really quite different.

But I don't know about Artemis very much.

On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 7:13 AM, Chris Mattmann <mattmann@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi Hen,
>
> Why not explore the use of Apache Artemis as an alternative?
>
> Cheers,
> Chris
>
>
>
>
> On 7/5/17, 11:23 PM, "Henri Yandell" <bayard@apache.org> wrote:
>
>     One of the items that is on the list to do before releasing Apache
> MXNet is
>     removing ZeroMQ from the codebase/dependencies.
>
>     ZeroMQ is licensed under the LGPL 3.0 with an exception for static
>     compiling.
>
>     They have long been interested in relicensing to MPL 2.0, but haven't
> made
>     much progress, though they did relicense JeroMQ (Java
>     wrapper/implementaiton) last year.
>
>     In the last few months they've made a lot of progress towards
> relicensing:
>     https://github.com/zeromq/libzmq/tree/master/RELICENSE
>
>     I'd like to ask on legal-discuss@ for an exception (one year?) to
> continue
>     using ZeroMQ, with prominent documentation, in MXNet given the trend
>     towards MPL 2.0.
>
>     Any concerns before I do so?
>
>     Thanks,
>
>     Hen
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message