incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Shane Curcuru <...@shanecurcuru.org>
Subject Re: ZeroMQ licensing in Apache MXNet
Date Thu, 06 Jul 2017 13:57:41 GMT
Greg Stein wrote on 7/6/17 4:01 AM:
> On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 1:23 AM, Henri Yandell <bayard@apache.org> wrote:
>> ...
> 
>> I'd like to ask on legal-discuss@ for an exception (one year?) to continue
>> using ZeroMQ, with prominent documentation, in MXNet given the trend
>> towards MPL 2.0.
>>
> 
> I'm not super cozy with the idea of explicit exceptions to licensing
> issues. Forward progress mitigates that a bit.

I'm not cozy either.  And you've confirmed crystal-clear that the
exception is clearly valid in this use case and that users won't somehow
believe (or need to act) as if the reciprocal clauses in the Zero*
software would apply to the podling's release?
> 
> Are there other libraries that could be used, should ZeroMQ *not* get
> itself relicensed? In other words, could there be a simultaneous move
> towards two options: new library, or a relicensed zeromq?
> 
> 
>> Any concerns before I do so?
>>
> 
> I'd say: no graduation, until solved, regardless of whether an exception is
> provided.

Agreed.  Including LGPL code in any Apache product release is not a good
idea immaterial of any explicit exceptions.  Merely because the
exception may technically make it legally compliant is not the point;
end-users will be surprised to see anything *GPL* in Apache products.

> 
> Cheers,
> -g
-- 

- Shane
  https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/resources

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message