incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Images in source code.
Date Fri, 02 Jun 2017 22:16:31 GMT
I think a README would be a better name for the explanatory file.



On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 11:20 PM, James Bognar <james.bognar@salesforce.com>
wrote:

> Thanks!
>
> I haven't found a metadata editor that works yet, so I'll just add a
> LICENSE.txt file to the directory.  Hopefully that's enough.
>
> On Fri, Jun 2, 2017 at 4:48 PM, Josh Elser <elserj@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > On 6/2/17 1:15 PM, James Bognar wrote:
> >
> >> I just added several png files to the source tree of our podling.  I
> >> created them myself.  Are there any best-practices on how to mark these
> as
> >> Apache licensed?
> >>
> >>
> > I'm not sure of a good way to track this. I'm not sure if png supports
> > arbitrary metadata which could be edited. Some ways I've seen used
> > elsewhere to try to better propagate license/ownership:
> >
> > * Comments on the issue-tracker issue that introduced them citing
> > origin/source (typically for images that are copied, not created)
> > * Entry in LICENSE/NOTICE (shouldn't be done unnecessarily, of course)
> > * A README in the same directory with relevant info
> >
> > If the images are of the podling's creation, I wouldn't be particularly
> > worried. The copyright notice on your source-release and LICENSE are
> > sufficient to inform downstream consumers.
> >
> > Probably not the answer you're looking for, but hope it helps :)
> >
> > - Josh
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> James Bognar
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message