incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "John D. Ament" <johndam...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Good examples of licensing in ASF produced web apps?
Date Fri, 26 May 2017 23:37:32 GMT
I'll point out that Ranger graduated the incubator with a less than stellar
release history.  [1] is a good example of such problems

Oozie predates me.

But to answer the original question, no, the requirements shouldn't be any
less stringent on WAR files vs other packages, its a closed package that is
hard to look at and needs to indicate everything within it.  While both of
these projects were incubating, they are no longer incubating and you
should follow up with them directly if you want them to fix their licensing.


[1]:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/2dda0fef19673055482574d6d7350273bb6db55026ab9f10b4cf461c@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E


On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 6:26 PM P. Taylor Goetz <ptgoetz@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> > On May 26, 2017, at 5:54 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <roman@shaposhnik.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > But that's actually not important -- you're right bundling
> > dependencies is OK, but
> > doing that makes it even more important to do proper LICENSE and NOTICE.
>
> IMO, you hit the nail on the head right there. I would hope the war file
> would contain both and they reflect the dependencies contained in the war
> file (as opposed to the official source distribution, which may not).
>
> -Taylor
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message