incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Arvind Surve <ac...@yahoo.com.INVALID>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.14.0-incubating (RC4)
Date Thu, 04 May 2017 03:48:13 GMT
Thanks John for response. Let me try to answer your third question.
>
> In the samples/images directory you have a bunch of files named "bluemix"
> which implies IBM Bluemix.  How are these images licensed?
> Arvind: These are screen shots, we can remove these images.
>
>
>
This doesn't answer my question.  My only question is how are they
licensed, I'm not necessarily asking you to remove them unless you don't
have rights to use them in which case they need to go.  Where did your team
get them from?

One of the SystemML member created notebook example using through Bluemix which is FREE trial
version.While in the process, person took snapshots so that other users can same procedure.In
short, person took screen shots from Bluemix site and added those images.Hope this answers
your question.
-Arvind
 Arvind Surve | Spark Technology Center  | http://www.spark.tc/

      From: John D. Ament <johndament@apache.org>
 To: Arvind Surve <acs_s@yahoo.com>; "general@incubator.apache.org" <general@incubator.apache.org>

 Sent: Wednesday, May 3, 2017 5:13 PM
 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.14.0-incubating (RC4)
   
Arvind,

On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 4:12 PM Arvind Surve <acs_s@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Hi John,
>
> Please see my response below and advise.
>
> For the first section, it doesn't seem to reference any files.  Why is it
> present?
> Arvind: It was part of sizzle.js license, got splitted when license for
> Pygments got added.
> We wil fix it.
>
>
> For the second, I can't find a "node_modules" directory.
> Arvind: This will be removed.
>
>
Ok to both of the above.

>
> In the samples/images directory you have a bunch of files named "bluemix"
> which implies IBM Bluemix.  How are these images licensed?
> Arvind: These are screen shots, we can remove these images.
>
>
>
This doesn't answer my question.  My only question is how are they
licensed, I'm not necessarily asking you to remove them unless you don't
have rights to use them in which case they need to go.  Where did your team
get them from?


> Please let me know if its ok to address all above changes in next release.
>
> Thanks
> Arvind
>
>
>
> Arvind Surve | Spark Technology Center  | http://www.spark.tc/
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* John D. Ament <johndament@apache.org>
> *To:* general@incubator.apache.org; Arvind Surve <acs_s@yahoo.com>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 2, 2017 5:32 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.14.0-incubating (RC4)
>
> Some questions about your release:
>
> The following appears in your license:
>
> Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining
> a copy of this software and associated documentation files (the
> "Software"), to deal in the Software without restriction, including
> without limitation the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish,
> distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies of the Software, and to
> permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do so, subject to
> the following conditions:
>
> The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be
> included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
>
> THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND,
> EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF
> MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND
> NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE
> LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION
> OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION
> WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE.
>
> ====
>
> All files located in the node_modules and external directories are
> externally maintained libraries used by this software which have their
> own licenses; we recommend you read them, as their terms may differ from
> the terms above.
>
> For the first section, it doesn't seem to reference any files.  Why is it
> present?
>
> For the second, I can't find a "node_modules" directory.
>
> In the samples/images directory you have a bunch of files named "bluemix"
> which implies IBM Bluemix.  How are these images licensed?
>
> John
>
> On Mon, May 1, 2017 at 12:42 PM Arvind Surve <acs_s@yahoo.com.invalid>
> wrote:
>
> > Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache SystemML
> > version 0.14.0-incubating !
> >
> >
> >
> > The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a majority of at
> > least 3 +1 PMC votes are cast.
> > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache SystemML 0.14.0-incubating[ ] -1 Do
> > not release this package because ...
> > To learn more about Apache SystemML, please see
> > http://systemml.apache.org/
> > The tag to be voted on is v0.14.0-incubating-rc4
> > (8bdcf106ca9bd04c0f68924ad5827eb7d7d54952)
> >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-systemml/commit/8bdcf106ca9bd04c0f68924ad5827eb7d7d54952
> >
> > The release artifacts can be found at :
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/systemml/0.14.0-incubating-rc4/
> > The maven release artifacts, including signatures, digests, etc. can
> > be found at:
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachesystemml-1021/org/apache/systemml/systemml/0.14.0-incubating/
> >
> > PPMC Vote Mail Threadhttps://
> > www.mail-archive.com/dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org/msg01611.html
> >
> > PPMC Vote Results Mailhttps://
> > www.mail-archive.com/dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org/msg01690.html
> >
> >  -Arvind
> >  Arvind Surve | Spark Technology Center  | http://www.spark.tc/
> >
> >
>
>
>


   
Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message