incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrew Purtell <andrew.purt...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PredictionIO 0.11.0 (incubating) RC2
Date Sun, 23 Apr 2017 17:11:09 GMT
No, you are free to make this release provided there is an issue tracking the RAT check failures
and a promise to fix them for the next release.  

> On Apr 23, 2017, at 8:50 AM, Pat Ferrel <pat@occamsmachete.com> wrote:
> 
> Many thanks! 
> 
> I for one was not aware we could change an RC without a podling vote, which seems better
in any case. These issues will be fixed asap in master and the live site.
> 
> 
> On Apr 22, 2017, at 6:28 PM, Andrew Purtell <andrew.purtell@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I was just trying to get something moving. Glad to see it. 
> 
> +1 (binding)
> 
>> On Apr 22, 2017, at 6:24 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1975@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Sure, I am ok having this become blocker if its still an issue on the next
>> release.
>> 
>> Here is my +1 the .
>> 
>>> On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 4:49 PM John D. Ament <johndament@apache.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> In general, the preference is to report the non-blocking issue, and confirm
>>> the podling has it entered into their bug tracker.  Then they accept
>>> the +1.  We don't generally wait for a code change to be made, but would
>>> block the next release if these issues are not addressed.  I personally
>>> want to understand why we're requiring the podling to fix it now before
>>> approving the release.  This looks like PredictionIO's first release, so we
>>> wouldn't have seen this already.
>>> 
>>> The contents of the release generally look good.  IN addition to the notes
>>> from Luciano, your NOTICE file should be updated to reflect 2016-2017 ASF.
>>> I would recommend renaming these files to just NOTICE and LICENSE and drop
>>> the .txt, to better comply with the licensing.
>>> 
>>> Here's my +1, not waiting for anything to be fixed.
>>> 
>>> John
>>> 
>>> On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 7:43 PM Andrew Purtell <andrew.purtell@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> I will too, and then you will have two binding votes in the affirmative.
>>>> 
>>>>> On Apr 22, 2017, at 12:34 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1975@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 12:14 PM, Pat Ferrel <pat@occamsmachete.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> But is it worth doing yet another podling RC and release vote?
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> If it is, please vote -1, at least we won’t be left waiting and
we
>>> thank
>>>>>> you for being the one who took a look either way.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> We are just trying to move, out if possible or iterate if not. These
>>>>>> issues have not changed from the current release and so do not
>>> indicate
>>>>>> regression and they have Jira’s for the next release.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> Not necessary, once this is fixed in master I would vote ok for the
>>>> current
>>>>> RC
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> Luciano Resende
>>>>> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
>>>>> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>>>> 
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> -- 
>> Sent from my Mobile device
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message