Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4674200C2F for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 10:40:02 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id A2FEF160B76; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 09:40:02 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id ED718160B73 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 10:40:01 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 59609 invoked by uid 500); 6 Mar 2017 09:40:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 59598 invoked by uid 99); 6 Mar 2017 09:40:00 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Mar 2017 09:40:00 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id E6A8BC69D3 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 09:39:59 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.28 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.28 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XrLQ-qbro1CL for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 09:39:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (relay4-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.196]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id E0C2C5FB6B for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 09:39:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mfilter32-d.gandi.net (mfilter32-d.gandi.net [217.70.178.163]) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29DD91722F1 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 10:39:58 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mfilter32-d.gandi.net Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([IPv6:::ffff:217.70.183.196]) by mfilter32-d.gandi.net (mfilter32-d.gandi.net [::ffff:10.0.15.180]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ztCCc1Pr3K0r for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 10:39:56 +0100 (CET) X-Originating-IP: 82.238.224.4 Received: from [192.168.134.16] (bre91-1-82-238-224-4.fbx.proxad.net [82.238.224.4]) (Authenticated sender: jb@nanthrax.net) by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7B86A172211 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 10:39:56 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: GitHub workflows? To: general@incubator.apache.org References: From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jean-Baptiste_Onofr=c3=a9?= Message-ID: <9a36c55f-d7d3-a8a7-99ad-e001ee24d26e@nanthrax.net> Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 10:39:56 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit archived-at: Mon, 06 Mar 2017 09:40:02 -0000 Hi Niclas, let me take the Beam example: - Issues are on Apache Jira (not GitHub issues) - We have a pull request. If a discussion happens on the mailing list cover than specific to the pull request, then, we start the discussion on the mailing list. - We don't consider pull request comments as discussions, we use dev mailing list to larger discussion. Regards JB On 03/06/2017 05:53 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: > Thanks Daniel, I should have thought of that, since that is how I noticed > it. > > So, then the question should have been; > > Are we ok with podlings using GH "Issues" instead of ASF-hosted issue > tracker? > > Are we ok that discussions happen on pull requests and commits? > > > I am a little bit uneasy about it, but does the Incubator as a whole have > an opinion/resolution on it? > > > Cheers > Niclas > > On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 11:58 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote: > >> On 03/06/2017 04:56 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote: >>> Everyone, >>> I need to get an understanding of the use of GitHub workflows on Apache >>> projects. >>> >>> In GH, it is possible to comment on commits and pull requests. Are those >>> captured by infra@ and replicated somewhere, or is this "lost data" (I >>> suspect) in case GitHub goes out of business? >> >> Pull requests and issues are relayed back to the projects' mailing >> list(s) automatically. Check, for instance, >> https://lists.apache.org/list.html?issues@trafficserver.apache.org >> >>> >>> Cheers >>> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org >> >> > > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbonofre@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org