Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73A33200C22 for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 22:51:55 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 724E6160B68; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 21:51:55 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 99899160B4F for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 22:51:54 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 11820 invoked by uid 500); 21 Feb 2017 21:51:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 11806 invoked by uid 99); 21 Feb 2017 21:51:48 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 21:51:48 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 9DA981809FE for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 21:51:47 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.38 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.38 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, KAM_COUK=1.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd3-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8rmGcDhRB89y for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 21:51:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id C41ED5F613 for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 21:51:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3E2F20880 for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 16:51:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from web6 ([10.202.2.216]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 21 Feb 2017 16:51:36 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=jf 9OUG3yrqcwCRrAaO5FDVyXwqk=; b=PoEf2i5601NeX33bZQN6O5nlsEU4s/WWl/ NYgzC7T/iYA01kDXf3wfVpv/BBOvBrWY+Oc2RT5s0T1u1+Ad0aN5FkUGXRAARrL6 p2yFB9VV263yE/xWFp7kwLMsE8nTmGX18J6Yk52qhAzW6eFPJmkzJagAXl09nipT LL5tbxj9I= X-ME-Sender: Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id A8CD048004; Tue, 21 Feb 2017 16:51:36 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <1487713896.2759787.888433944.22B0BA7B@webmail.messagingengine.com> From: Upayavira To: general@incubator.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-715c2c0c References: <1487027726.271589.879970376.66457B1D@webmail.messagingengine.com> Subject: Re: Podling Graduation Rally Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 21:51:36 +0000 In-Reply-To: archived-at: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 21:51:55 -0000 I think that nothing is likely to change in the project - it is going to go on the same as this for a long time. If it is ready, it is right on the bottom of minimal. It does have enough prospective PMC members, but just enough - maybe 4 or 5. It has made a release, and it has just managed a source code donation, and it has accepted new committers. I am starting to consider that this has to be sufficient activity to justify graduation, although it is certainly on the lower limit. Thoughts? Upayavira On Tue, 14 Feb 2017, at 03:16 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > Upayavira, > > I've pinged the podling in the past about graduation. *I* think you're > ready. > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 6:15 PM Upayavira wrote: > > > I would appreciate assistance in deciding whether Wave needs more than > > its current slow, but not stationary, development. > > > > Upayavira > > > > On Mon, 13 Feb 2017, at 06:07 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > > > Awesome news, thanks everyone. > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 12:17 PM Suneel Marthi > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Streams was also called as 'Ready to graduate' in the December report. > > > > > > > > Since Oct 2016, the podling has had 3 releases and another release is > > > > planned for this weekend. > > > > > > > > There have been discussions on the podIing mail lists about graduation > > > > following the next planned release. I can help push forward Streams > > > > graduation and the podling has satisfied most of the Apache Maturity > > > > Assessment - see > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/STREAMS/Apache+Maturity+Model+Assessment+for+Streams > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 7:51 AM, Pierre Smits > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi John, > > > > > > > > > > Thank you for bringing this to our attention. I guess it should be > > > > brought > > > > > back regularly so that participants here stay on the ball. > > > > > > > > > > That being said, I believe Trafodion should also be considered to be > > > > ready. > > > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > > > > > Pierre Smits > > > > > > > > > > ORRTIZ.COM > > > > > OFBiz based solutions & services > > > > > > > > > > OFBiz Extensions Marketplace > > > > > http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/ > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 1:28 PM, John D. Ament < > > johndament@apache.org> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > All, > > > > > > > > > > > > As mentioned in this month's report, there are 63 active podlings. > > > > While > > > > > > I've been chasing retiring podlings, I think it would be good for > > the > > > > > > community as a whole to look closely as podlings and see what we > > can do > > > > > to > > > > > > graduate podlings that seem to be doing well. > > > > > > > > > > > > Take a look at the last two reports: > > > > > > > > > > > > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/February2017 > > > > > > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/January2017 > > > > > > > > > > > > Last month, I listed 4 podlings that appear to have completed all > > > > > > graduation requirements, but remain in the incubator (Airflow, > > BatchEE, > > > > > > Freemarker, Metron). I didn't include that in February, but if I > > had > > > > to > > > > > > list the names, it would be: CarbonData, Edgent, Fineract, > > Guacamole, > > > > > > PredictionIO, SystemML, Tamaya, Unomi (but that's entirely my > > > > POV/opinion > > > > > > unless others want to chime in). > > > > > > > > > > > > So I'm curious, what can others do to help these 12 podlings get > > past > > > > the > > > > > > finish line? > > > > > > > > > > > > John > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org