incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dan Kirkwood <dang...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Traffic Control 1.8.0-incubating (RC9)
Date Thu, 16 Feb 2017 00:56:23 GMT
Thanks,   John..    we do have a new PR that intends to address these
issues (currently only in master):
https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/pull/285

I intend to examine that tomorrow morning and pull it in to 1.8 if all
looks good -- there will be a few changes needed to address diffs
between 1.8 and master,  but not significant.   If you have a chance
to look at that PR and give a thumbs-up,  it would help greatly..

thanks for all your help.. Dan

On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 5:37 PM, John D. Ament <johndament@apache.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 5:10 PM Marvin Humphrey <marvin@rectangular.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 1:00 PM, John D. Ament <johndament@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 3:05 PM Marvin Humphrey <marvin@rectangular.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 11:58 AM, Dan Kirkwood <dangogh@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Personally, the reason why I'm asking about the impact is to better make
>> a
>> > judgment call on whether to block or not.  I don't particularly see why
>> > we're now being jumped on over this fact.
>>
>> John,
>>
>> My email was rushed because I wanted to preempt cancellation of the
>> vote. I see now that it can be read in a more confrontational tone
>> than was meant.
>>
>> Thank you very much for taking the time to review the release
>> candidate. I'll make the case for more lenience in general when
>> approving incubating release candidates on a separate thread later
>> today.
>>
>
> Marvin,
>
> Its OK.  I myself am frazzled over lots of things going on around me.  So I
> know some of my responses as of late have either been way too
> short/confrontational and too long/fillibustery.  So I know where you're
> coming from.
>
> I look forward to arguing with you over podling releases in a separate
> thread.
>
> Dan,
>
> So here's my point of view.  Justin's provided some more context on how to
> shape licenses.  If you feel very strongly that the release should go out
> the door, the way it is, then I am OK with changing my vote to a +1.  If
> however, you're like me, and would prefer accuracy over speed, I think its
> worth your time to fix the remaining license issues, package up a CR10, and
> see that the IPMC votes +1 without reservations (it gives better confidence
> that you can cut an ASF release).
>
> I'm even willing to help you rewrite your license file for accuracy.
>
> John
>
>
>>
>> Marvin Humphrey
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message