incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Pierre Smits <pierre.sm...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Drop incubating requirement of Maven artifacts
Date Wed, 04 Jan 2017 07:51:06 GMT
John,

I guess the discussion will go on, every time the topic will be brought
forward to the public mailings lists. Conducting politics is part of the
human nature. Keeping the discussion going will have the Incubator project
running in circles. Calling a vote on a procedural change and reporting the
result will help the project.

Not everything needs unanimous consent. A simple majority suffices to
establish a direction until the next vote on the same subject.

Best regards,

Pierre Smits

ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>
OFBiz based solutions & services

OFBiz Extensions Marketplace
http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/

On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 7:28 AM, Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de.invalid>
wrote:

> I guess you are talking about log4j/log4j or the various commons-*
> groupIds?
> This is true, but for completness sake I want to point out that there is a
> difference to use a different _unused_ groupId vs using a _foreign_ one.
>
> I guess everyone would agree that the ASF does not like to publish
> artifacts with a com.oracle groupId, right?
>
> I'm a bit surprised that groovy still uses the org.codehaus groupId, but I
> guess they have a deal with Ben (the former owner and thus (former?)
> copyright holder of 'Codehaus').
> So while this will work for now I guess that even groovy will move to
> org.apache.groovy in the long term (maybe with a new major version).
>
> It's not a big deal YET, but http://codehaus.org is not reachable
> anymore. And if anyone buys this domain he will have a much better position
> regarding trademarks than we do.
> What if someone buys the codehaus.org domain and publishes own artifacts
> under org.codehaus.groovy? Can we even prevent someone else to e.g publish
> org.codehaus.groovyng artifacts?
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
> > Am 04.01.2017 um 02:49 schrieb John D. Ament <johndament@apache.org>:
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 8:43 PM Daniel Dekany <ddekany@freemail.hu>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Tuesday, January 3, 2017, 11:10:24 PM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
> >>
> >> [snip]
> >>> The workaround of publishing binaries without any
> -incubator/-incubating
> >>> markers by using a non-apache group/name is probably a somewhat
> workable
> >>> solution for larger established projects like Groovy, but may also work
> >>> against community as it de-emphasises ASF, and outsiders might so
> easily
> >>> realise that the community is changing before graduation.
> >> [snip]
> >>
> >> Note that the non-Apache group/name is not meant to be a workaround to
> >> avoid "-incubating". It's about not burdening the Java ecosystem with
> >> a groupId change.
> >>
> >
> > Just to point out, again, there are even top level projects that don't
> > publish under org.apache.  There's no requirement to do so.
> >
> >
> >>
> >> --
> >> Thanks,
> >> Daniel Dekany-incubating
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >>
> >>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message