Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CF92200BEE for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2016 17:33:33 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 9BAAD160B28; Sat, 31 Dec 2016 16:33:33 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id DF69A160B15 for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2016 17:33:32 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 6729 invoked by uid 500); 31 Dec 2016 16:33:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 6718 invoked by uid 99); 31 Dec 2016 16:33:31 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 31 Dec 2016 16:33:31 +0000 Received: from mail-yw0-f178.google.com (mail-yw0-f178.google.com [209.85.161.178]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id 249D41A06B6 for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2016 16:33:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yw0-f178.google.com with SMTP id v81so141659585ywb.2 for ; Sat, 31 Dec 2016 08:33:30 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXKzgivGCOIZjN+KwXp2HcnisYw8u5YLiFAb5am1wIzVAsRejPHQ09eQ8JkrRBtDpz1pNw7NFHi9DfgCTA== X-Received: by 10.129.39.136 with SMTP id n130mr43548772ywn.129.1483202010045; Sat, 31 Dec 2016 08:33:30 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1237657128.20161228021840@freemail.hu> <1459337165.20161231154035@freemail.hu> In-Reply-To: <1459337165.20161231154035@freemail.hu> From: "John D. Ament" Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2016 16:33:19 +0000 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: Omitting "-incubating" suffix in Maven artifact version attribute for FreeMarker To: general@incubator.apache.org, Daniel Dekany Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1141dd20f065d90544f6e012 archived-at: Sat, 31 Dec 2016 16:33:33 -0000 --001a1141dd20f065d90544f6e012 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Just to level set. I don't think its fair to expect a special policy for a single podling. On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 9:40 AM Daniel Dekany wrote: > The original question in this thread is much less generic than in the > linked one though, so it's certainly easier to answer. Just as a > reminder, the specialities are these: > > - This project already have suffixless releases from before > incubation, which are widely used. If the incubation fails, those > versions won't be any better that the incubating ones. After all, ASF > won't go around and delete those releases from the Maven Central, > from SF.net, etc. > > - The project doesn't have an org.apache.* Maven groupId, nor a such > Java package (in 2.x.x, because of backward compatibility, and we > are talking about 2.x.x only here). So as far as I see it's quite > unlikely that the user will see "Apache" without "incubating" > because we have removed it from the *Maven* version number, at least > if we change Apache FreeMarker in the POM to > Apache FreeMarker (incubating). > > -- > Thanks, > Daniel Dekany > > > Saturday, December 31, 2016, 1:50:02 PM, Martijn Dashorst wrote: > > > For reference, please read this thread from 2008: > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/0b6c065a908c5f9ec39fa78c31b39c83a6fea29eb34fada0ee070413@1222432864@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E > > > > It has all the arguments for and against the -incubating versioning > > label, and why the disclaimer exists. Warning: it is long (I haven't > > even reached the conclusion after about an hour of reading). > > > > It goes of a bit about releasing through Maven, and some quibles with > > central repository management and releases and other politics, but it > > should be enlightening to see all positions. Read it with an open mind > > and don't look only for the bits that support your position, but try > > to understand the other side as well. > > > > Martijn > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 6:54 PM, Jacopo Cappellato > > wrote: > >> On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 8:44 PM, Martijn Dashorst < > >> martijn.dashorst@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >>> [...] > >>> Freemarker has been in incubation for 17 months. What do you need to > >>> learn and do before you will start your graduation vote? > >>> > >> > >> In my opinion the Freemarker project would be ready to successfully > pass a > >> graduation vote and a discussion thread is going on in the project's > >> mailing list; based on how the conversation is going the community may > >> decide to wait a few more weeks in order to try to attract some > committers. > >> However I think that the topic discussed in this thread (about the > concern > >> that the "-incubating" suffix may mislead the consumers about the > stability > >> of a software product) is a valid one; even if its output will not > probably > >> affect Freemarker (that could be a TLP by then). > >> > >> Jacopo > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org > > --001a1141dd20f065d90544f6e012--