Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA8E8200BF0 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2016 18:09:39 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id D9190160B32; Fri, 30 Dec 2016 17:09:39 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 2B772160B19 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2016 18:09:39 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 35167 invoked by uid 500); 30 Dec 2016 17:09:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 35152 invoked by uid 99); 30 Dec 2016 17:09:37 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 30 Dec 2016 17:09:37 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 4C25618C361 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2016 17:09:37 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.552 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.552 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[KAM_THEBAT=1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.652] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z-cwrUWuQnZA for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2016 17:09:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vie01a-dmta-pe04-3.mx.upcmail.net (vie01a-dmta-pe04-3.mx.upcmail.net [62.179.121.165]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 1B5E85F398 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2016 17:09:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.31.216.44] (helo=vie01a-pemc-psmtp-pe02) by vie01a-dmta-pe04.mx.upcmail.net with esmtp (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1cN0gB-0002Rk-KP for general@incubator.apache.org; Fri, 30 Dec 2016 18:09:19 +0100 Received: from [192.168.0.3] ([89.132.92.167]) by vie01a-pemc-psmtp-pe02 with SMTP @ mailcloud.upcmail.net id SH9H1u01l3cfLdl01H9K7z; Fri, 30 Dec 2016 18:09:19 +0100 X-SourceIP: 89.132.92.167 Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2016 18:09:19 +0100 From: Daniel Dekany X-Mailer: The Bat! (v4.2.36.4) Professional Reply-To: Daniel Dekany X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1399335515.20161230180919@freemail.hu> To: Martijn Dashorst Subject: Re: Omitting "-incubating" suffix in Maven artifact version attribute for FreeMarker In-Reply-To: References: <1237657128.20161228021840@freemail.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit archived-at: Fri, 30 Dec 2016 17:09:40 -0000 Thursday, December 29, 2016, 9:41:20 PM, Emilian Bold wrote: În joi, 29 dec. 2016 la 21:44 Martijn Dashorst a scris: > You are trying to fix the wrong thing. The whole idea of the > -incubating moniker is to communicate to end users that the project > is inside the incubator, and can fail incubation. That argument might makes sense for some projects that start their life here, but in this case it doesn't apply, because the question now is not if people dare to use FreeMarker, but if which version of it are they using. Even if we assume the worse, that the incubation fails and the whole project is terminated and so on, how are users better of with 2.3.23 (the last non-Apache release) than with 2.3.25-incubating? I don't see any additional risk in using 2.3.25-incubating versus 2.3.23. (I only see addition risk the other way around.) > The only and best way to get rid of the -incubating scheme is to > *graduate*. Graduating FreeMarker is a different topic, and we will start a thread for that when there's a consensus regarding that inside the PPMC. The Maven version suffix is a problem that can be addressed separately. That we couldn't graduate yet, doesn't make the releases less stable than the earlier releases from outside Apache. > Don't remain in the incubator hiding in your community, but fix those > licensing issues, grow your community, reach out to the wider > incubator community outside your 3 monthly report and hook up with > other Apache projects for collaboration. >> > Freemarker has been in incubation for 17 months. What do you need to > learn and do before you will start your graduation vote? -- Thanks, Daniel Dekany --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org