Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id A185E200BC5 for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 13:48:34 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id A040B160B0C; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 12:48:34 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id E8B4A160B0A for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 13:48:33 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 99024 invoked by uid 500); 22 Nov 2016 12:48:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 99012 invoked by uid 99); 22 Nov 2016 12:48:32 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 12:48:32 +0000 Received: from mail-wm0-f54.google.com (mail-wm0-f54.google.com [74.125.82.54]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id 570301A002B for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 12:48:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm0-f54.google.com with SMTP id t79so23393354wmt.0 for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 04:48:31 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC02QyvVZaKqenkn0I9q/7uGk2h0VV+KypLtxEayo6NnKS2nf04ysGLa/F9elU+PNFGDV+sscjbeYSMaJYQ== X-Received: by 10.28.29.23 with SMTP id d23mr2142178wmd.91.1479818909403; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 04:48:29 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.28.2.213 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 04:48:28 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <029601d2437b$e8c52bc0$ba4f8340$@samsung.com> From: Bertrand Delacretaz Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 13:48:28 +0100 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Weex for Apache Incubator To: Incubator General Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 archived-at: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 12:48:34 -0000 On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 1:27 PM, Emilian Bold wrote: > ...unless somebody really plans to veto the incubation proposal due to this > very minor linguistic issue and considering the fact that the project has > some history and is already publicly known under this name I would drop > this issue... An incubation proposal cannot be vetoed. A project name could be rejected by the Board when graduating if we feel it puts the foundation at risk. A blatant trademark problem might do that, a name that's not politically correct in some regions won't. Such name warnings at the beginning of incubation are good IMO as the further the project progresses the harder it gets to change its name. In this case, the decision is in the hands of the incoming podling and its mentors - the comments in this thread should be considered friendly advice, nothing more. -Bertrand --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org