incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "John D. Ament" <johndam...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC5)
Date Thu, 10 Nov 2016 19:36:25 GMT
Hi,

So I'm comfortable giving a +1 on the release source tarball.  It looks
complete enough to pass.

I am generally concerned about the release management on the podling.  We
can follow up.

John

On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 1:51 PM Luciano Resende <luckbr1975@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Ping, are there any other issues to be resolved ? Otherwise we would really
> like to have this reviewed in time for our session on Apache Big Data early
> next week.
>
> Thanks
>
> On Tuesday, November 8, 2016, Luciano Resende <luckbr1975@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > We have reviewed and reduced the number of artifacts for RC5 :
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/systemml/0.
> > 11.0-incubating-rc5/
> >
> > It only contains the following now :
> > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.tar.gz
> > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.tar.gz.asc
> > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.tar.gz.md5
> > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.tar.gz.sha
> > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.zip
> > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.zip.asc
> > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.zip.md5
> > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.zip.sha
> > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.tar.gz
> > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.tar.gz.asc
> > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.tar.gz.md5
> > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.tar.gz.sha
> > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.zip
> > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.zip.asc
> > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.zip.md5
> > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.zip.sha
> >
> >
> > There is also a blocking jira that we are working for future releases.
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-926
> >
> > Based on this, here is my +1.
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 12:16 PM, John D. Ament <johndament@apache.org
> > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','johndament@apache.org');>> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Deron,
> >>
> >> Here's an example from a release I did recently for a TLP to give you
> some
> >> guidance.  https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/deltaspike/1.7.2/
> >> (and
> >> i'm sure others may find some errors in what I did - no one's perfect)
> >>
> >> In this release, for each file there are 3 accompanying files - the
> .asc,
> >> .sha1. and the .md5.  Your release is missing sha1's, but i'm not sure
> >> that's too important.
> >>
> >> The overall release contents are made up of:
> >>
> >> - Source ZIP file
> >> - POM file for the root of the project
> >> - The convenience binary zip
> >> - The convenience binary .tar.gz
> >>
> >> I actually have a note to not copy the tests JAR in the future.  I think
> >> the problem area is that its not clear looking at the file names what is
> >> what in your release.  If your release only included a single source
> zip,
> >> two convenience binaries (tar.gz and zip) as well as the relevant asc
> and
> >> md5 files, they were all named properly, that would be perfect.
> >>
> >> John
> >>
> >> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 3:00 PM Deron Eriksson <deroneriksson@gmail.com
> >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','deroneriksson@gmail.com');>>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hello,
> >> >
> >> > Thank you for your patience. For release candidate validation, would
> it
> >> be
> >> > acceptable and helpful to reduce the dist artifacts to the following
> >> with
> >> > their accompanying signature files? It would be nice if we could
> include
> >> > the binary distribution with dependencies. This would reduce the dist
> >> > artifacts from 9 to 4.
> >> >
> >> > Source distribution:
> >> > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.tar.gz
> >> > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.zip
> >> >
> >> > Binary distribution with dependencies:
> >> > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-standalone.tar.gz
> >> > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-standalone.zip
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/systemml/0.
> >> 11.0-incubating-rc5/
> >> >
> >> > Thank you,
> >> > Deron
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 9:06 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1975@gmail.com
> >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','luckbr1975@gmail.com');>>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 7:36 PM, Justin Mclean <
> >> justin@classsoftware.com
> >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','justin@classsoftware.com');>>
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > Hi,
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > I understand that the most important thing for Apache is
the
> >> source
> >> > > > release
> >> > > > > artifact, but that does not prohibit a project from distributing
> >> > > > > convenience binaries as long as they meet all the legal
> >> requirements
> >> > > > > mandated by Apache.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Which is fine but currently it is not clear (to an external
> person)
> >> > > > exactly what is what in that directory and the VOTE email doesn’t
> >> > clarify
> >> > > > it.
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> > > Yes, it's a bit confusing, so maybe it's a matter of adding a README
> >> to
> >> > > clarify what are the artifacts being released.
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > Also, the release structure hasn't changed much from
> >> > > > > our previous release
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Which I asked about the last RC and got no reply. I took a guess
> but
> >> > > still
> >> > > > not sure if it was right or not and if everything got reviewed.
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > Sorry for not getting back to you on the list of artifacts, I have
> >> > > documented them on the following thread on the SystemML mailing
> list:
> >> > > https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@systemml.incubator.apache.
> >> > > org/msg01121.html
> >> > >
> >> > > Also, from previous RC the community removed one jar from the
> release
> >> > > (*-standalone.jar) and all other artifacts were reviewed by the
> >> SystemML
> >> > > podling members. We are also looking into reducing the number of
> >> > > distributed artifacts for our next release which should avoid
> further
> >> > > confusion on the matter.
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > > Thanks,
> >> > > > Justin
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > --
> >> > > Luciano Resende
> >> > > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> >> > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Luciano Resende
> > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> >
>
>
> --
> Sent from my Mobile device
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message