incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] OpenWhisk Proposal
Date Sat, 05 Nov 2016 21:44:15 GMT
I second John, about Github uses.

The statement "As a community we would like to keep the master repository
as well as issue tracking on GitHub
<https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/GitHub>" at currently stand is a no-no
and putting in proposal would make it as goal which at this time not an
option in ASF infra.

- Henry

On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 2:29 PM, John D. Ament <johndament@apache.org> wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 10:49 AM Felix Meschberger <fmeschbe@adobe.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi John
> >
> > My understanding is, that we are well aware of this concern, which others
> > have mentioned as well.
> >
> > Also Greg noted in the proposal:
> >
> > > gstein sez: the podling can only graduate within an approved repository
> > system. The IPMC may have a differing opinion, but from an Infra
> > perspective: the OpenWhisk podling can continue with their usage of a
> > GitHub repository, but faces a clear obstacle: GitHub "as master [as
> > allowed by the Foundation]" must be approved and working before the
> > graduation, or they must migrate their primary to the Foundation's Git
> > repository (at git-wip) before they graduate.
> >
>
> I would like to get other IPMC members to weigh in on this comment, before
> I comment.  Greg is the Infra Admin, he is an IPMC member but that's
> obligatory.  He is explicitly stating that the IPMC may have an opinion
> other than his own.
>
>
> >
> > I think this sounds like a good compromise to work on and the poddling
> > intends to work actively with Infra to see that we can stay in GitHub. If
> > that is not possible, we byte the bullet accordingly.
> >
> > In addition, also according to Greg:
> >
> > > We require that anybody committing to a GitHub repository authenticates
> > with BOTH: GitHub, and the ASF. No commits without that multiple
> > authentication. (this is based on our current experiments with Whimsy and
> > Traffic Server; same rules would apply to this podling)
> >
> > The original discussion took place after the initial submission, see [1]
> >
> > Does that help ?
> >
> > Regards
> > Felix
> >
> > [1]
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/1c22a29b69e944ee725278aae05bd4
> 1dea80d10d0d204c26eb4cb24c@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E
> >
> > > Am 04.11.2016 um 15:20 schrieb John D. Ament <johndament@apache.org>:
> > >
> > > I raised the concern over using github as the primary repo.  This is
> > still
> > > unresolved, as I understood it.
> > >
> > > John
> > >
> > > On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 9:36 AM Felix Meschberger <fmeschbe@adobe.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi all
> > >>
> > >> I have made some additions to the OpenWhisk Proposal [1]:
> > >>
> > >> - restructured the API Gateway references: It is expected
> > >>   that the API Gateway will be refactored with additional
> > >>   code donated by IBM during incubation.
> > >> - added a note on the API Gateway’s dependency on OpenSSL
> > >> - added a note on Trademarks IBM is currently pursuing and
> > >>   intends to transfer to ASF
> > >> - fixed some typos
> > >>
> > >> With these changes and no discussions over the course of the recent
> > weeks,
> > >> I would propose we could could vote for OpenWhisk to become an
> > incubating
> > >> project over the course of next weeks.
> > >>
> > >> Of course we are still open to welcome interested people to become
> > initial
> > >> committers to OpenWhisk Servlerless Runtime and API Gateway !
> > >>
> > >> WDYT ?
> > >>
> > >> Regards
> > >> Felix
> > >>
> > >> [1] https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/OpenWhiskProposal
> > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> > >>
> >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message