incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC5)
Date Sat, 12 Nov 2016 09:05:50 GMT
And we received another IPMC binding +1 from our mentor Reynold at the
SystemML dev list

https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@systemml.incubator.apache.org/msg01126.html

On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 8:36 PM, John D. Ament <johndament@apache.org>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> So I'm comfortable giving a +1 on the release source tarball.  It looks
> complete enough to pass.
>
> I am generally concerned about the release management on the podling.  We
> can follow up.
>
> John
>
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 1:51 PM Luciano Resende <luckbr1975@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Ping, are there any other issues to be resolved ? Otherwise we would
> really
> > like to have this reviewed in time for our session on Apache Big Data
> early
> > next week.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > On Tuesday, November 8, 2016, Luciano Resende <luckbr1975@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > We have reviewed and reduced the number of artifacts for RC5 :
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/systemml/0.
> > > 11.0-incubating-rc5/
> > >
> > > It only contains the following now :
> > > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.tar.gz
> > > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.tar.gz.asc
> > > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.tar.gz.md5
> > > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.tar.gz.sha
> > > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.zip
> > > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.zip.asc
> > > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.zip.md5
> > > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.zip.sha
> > > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.tar.gz
> > > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.tar.gz.asc
> > > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.tar.gz.md5
> > > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.tar.gz.sha
> > > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.zip
> > > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.zip.asc
> > > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.zip.md5
> > > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.zip.sha
> > >
> > >
> > > There is also a blocking jira that we are working for future releases.
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-926
> > >
> > > Based on this, here is my +1.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 12:16 PM, John D. Ament <johndament@apache.org
> > > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','johndament@apache.org');>> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi Deron,
> > >>
> > >> Here's an example from a release I did recently for a TLP to give you
> > some
> > >> guidance.  https://dist.apache.org/repos/
> dist/release/deltaspike/1.7.2/
> > >> (and
> > >> i'm sure others may find some errors in what I did - no one's perfect)
> > >>
> > >> In this release, for each file there are 3 accompanying files - the
> > .asc,
> > >> .sha1. and the .md5.  Your release is missing sha1's, but i'm not sure
> > >> that's too important.
> > >>
> > >> The overall release contents are made up of:
> > >>
> > >> - Source ZIP file
> > >> - POM file for the root of the project
> > >> - The convenience binary zip
> > >> - The convenience binary .tar.gz
> > >>
> > >> I actually have a note to not copy the tests JAR in the future.  I
> think
> > >> the problem area is that its not clear looking at the file names what
> is
> > >> what in your release.  If your release only included a single source
> > zip,
> > >> two convenience binaries (tar.gz and zip) as well as the relevant asc
> > and
> > >> md5 files, they were all named properly, that would be perfect.
> > >>
> > >> John
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 3:00 PM Deron Eriksson <
> deroneriksson@gmail.com
> > >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','deroneriksson@gmail.com');>>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Hello,
> > >> >
> > >> > Thank you for your patience. For release candidate validation, would
> > it
> > >> be
> > >> > acceptable and helpful to reduce the dist artifacts to the following
> > >> with
> > >> > their accompanying signature files? It would be nice if we could
> > include
> > >> > the binary distribution with dependencies. This would reduce the
> dist
> > >> > artifacts from 9 to 4.
> > >> >
> > >> > Source distribution:
> > >> > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.tar.gz
> > >> > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.zip
> > >> >
> > >> > Binary distribution with dependencies:
> > >> > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-standalone.tar.gz
> > >> > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-standalone.zip
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/systemml/0.
> > >> 11.0-incubating-rc5/
> > >> >
> > >> > Thank you,
> > >> > Deron
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 9:06 PM, Luciano Resende <
> luckbr1975@gmail.com
> > >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','luckbr1975@gmail.com');>>
> > >> > wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 7:36 PM, Justin Mclean <
> > >> justin@classsoftware.com
> > >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','justin@classsoftware.com');>>
> > >> > > wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > Hi,
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > > I understand that the most important thing for Apache
is the
> > >> source
> > >> > > > release
> > >> > > > > artifact, but that does not prohibit a project from
> distributing
> > >> > > > > convenience binaries as long as they meet all the legal
> > >> requirements
> > >> > > > > mandated by Apache.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Which is fine but currently it is not clear (to an external
> > person)
> > >> > > > exactly what is what in that directory and the VOTE email
> doesn’t
> > >> > clarify
> > >> > > > it.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Yes, it's a bit confusing, so maybe it's a matter of adding a
> README
> > >> to
> > >> > > clarify what are the artifacts being released.
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > > Also, the release structure hasn't changed much from
> > >> > > > > our previous release
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Which I asked about the last RC and got no reply. I took
a guess
> > but
> > >> > > still
> > >> > > > not sure if it was right or not and if everything got reviewed.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > Sorry for not getting back to you on the list of artifacts, I
have
> > >> > > documented them on the following thread on the SystemML mailing
> > list:
> > >> > > https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@systemml.incubator.apache.
> > >> > > org/msg01121.html
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Also, from previous RC the community removed one jar from the
> > release
> > >> > > (*-standalone.jar) and all other artifacts were reviewed by the
> > >> SystemML
> > >> > > podling members. We are also looking into reducing the number
of
> > >> > > distributed artifacts for our next release which should avoid
> > further
> > >> > > confusion on the matter.
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > Thanks,
> > >> > > > Justin
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > --
> > >> > > Luciano Resende
> > >> > > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > >> > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Luciano Resende
> > > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sent from my Mobile device
> >
>



-- 
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message