incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC5)
Date Wed, 09 Nov 2016 01:22:07 GMT
We have reviewed and reduced the number of artifacts for RC5 :
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/systemml/0.11.0-incubating-rc5/

It only contains the following now :
systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.tar.gz
systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.tar.gz.asc
systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.tar.gz.md5
systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.tar.gz.sha
systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.zip
systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.zip.asc
systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.zip.md5
systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.zip.sha
systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.tar.gz
systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.tar.gz.asc
systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.tar.gz.md5
systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.tar.gz.sha
systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.zip
systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.zip.asc
systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.zip.md5
systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.zip.sha


There is also a blocking jira that we are working for future releases.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-926

Based on this, here is my +1.


On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 12:16 PM, John D. Ament <johndament@apache.org>
wrote:

> Hi Deron,
>
> Here's an example from a release I did recently for a TLP to give you some
> guidance.  https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/deltaspike/1.7.2/
> (and
> i'm sure others may find some errors in what I did - no one's perfect)
>
> In this release, for each file there are 3 accompanying files - the .asc,
> .sha1. and the .md5.  Your release is missing sha1's, but i'm not sure
> that's too important.
>
> The overall release contents are made up of:
>
> - Source ZIP file
> - POM file for the root of the project
> - The convenience binary zip
> - The convenience binary .tar.gz
>
> I actually have a note to not copy the tests JAR in the future.  I think
> the problem area is that its not clear looking at the file names what is
> what in your release.  If your release only included a single source zip,
> two convenience binaries (tar.gz and zip) as well as the relevant asc and
> md5 files, they were all named properly, that would be perfect.
>
> John
>
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 3:00 PM Deron Eriksson <deroneriksson@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Thank you for your patience. For release candidate validation, would it
> be
> > acceptable and helpful to reduce the dist artifacts to the following with
> > their accompanying signature files? It would be nice if we could include
> > the binary distribution with dependencies. This would reduce the dist
> > artifacts from 9 to 4.
> >
> > Source distribution:
> > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.tar.gz
> > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.zip
> >
> > Binary distribution with dependencies:
> > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-standalone.tar.gz
> > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-standalone.zip
> >
> >
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/systemml/0.
> 11.0-incubating-rc5/
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Deron
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 9:06 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1975@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 7:36 PM, Justin Mclean <
> justin@classsoftware.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > > I understand that the most important thing for Apache is the source
> > > > release
> > > > > artifact, but that does not prohibit a project from distributing
> > > > > convenience binaries as long as they meet all the legal
> requirements
> > > > > mandated by Apache.
> > > >
> > > > Which is fine but currently it is not clear (to an external person)
> > > > exactly what is what in that directory and the VOTE email doesn’t
> > clarify
> > > > it.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Yes, it's a bit confusing, so maybe it's a matter of adding a README to
> > > clarify what are the artifacts being released.
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > Also, the release structure hasn't changed much from
> > > > > our previous release
> > > >
> > > > Which I asked about the last RC and got no reply. I took a guess but
> > > still
> > > > not sure if it was right or not and if everything got reviewed.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > Sorry for not getting back to you on the list of artifacts, I have
> > > documented them on the following thread on the SystemML mailing list:
> > > https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@systemml.incubator.apache.
> > > org/msg01121.html
> > >
> > > Also, from previous RC the community removed one jar from the release
> > > (*-standalone.jar) and all other artifacts were reviewed by the
> SystemML
> > > podling members. We are also looking into reducing the number of
> > > distributed artifacts for our next release which should avoid further
> > > confusion on the matter.
> > >
> > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Justin
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Luciano Resende
> > > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> > >
> >
>



-- 
Luciano Resende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message