incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache SystemML 0.11.0-incubating (RC5)
Date Thu, 10 Nov 2016 18:50:43 GMT
Ping, are there any other issues to be resolved ? Otherwise we would really
like to have this reviewed in time for our session on Apache Big Data early
next week.

Thanks

On Tuesday, November 8, 2016, Luciano Resende <luckbr1975@gmail.com> wrote:

> We have reviewed and reduced the number of artifacts for RC5 :
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/systemml/0.
> 11.0-incubating-rc5/
>
> It only contains the following now :
> systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.tar.gz
> systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.tar.gz.asc
> systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.tar.gz.md5
> systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.tar.gz.sha
> systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.zip
> systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.zip.asc
> systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.zip.md5
> systemml-0.11.0-incubating-bin.zip.sha
> systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.tar.gz
> systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.tar.gz.asc
> systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.tar.gz.md5
> systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.tar.gz.sha
> systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.zip
> systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.zip.asc
> systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.zip.md5
> systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.zip.sha
>
>
> There is also a blocking jira that we are working for future releases.
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SYSTEMML-926
>
> Based on this, here is my +1.
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 12:16 PM, John D. Ament <johndament@apache.org
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','johndament@apache.org');>> wrote:
>
>> Hi Deron,
>>
>> Here's an example from a release I did recently for a TLP to give you some
>> guidance.  https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/deltaspike/1.7.2/
>> (and
>> i'm sure others may find some errors in what I did - no one's perfect)
>>
>> In this release, for each file there are 3 accompanying files - the .asc,
>> .sha1. and the .md5.  Your release is missing sha1's, but i'm not sure
>> that's too important.
>>
>> The overall release contents are made up of:
>>
>> - Source ZIP file
>> - POM file for the root of the project
>> - The convenience binary zip
>> - The convenience binary .tar.gz
>>
>> I actually have a note to not copy the tests JAR in the future.  I think
>> the problem area is that its not clear looking at the file names what is
>> what in your release.  If your release only included a single source zip,
>> two convenience binaries (tar.gz and zip) as well as the relevant asc and
>> md5 files, they were all named properly, that would be perfect.
>>
>> John
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 3:00 PM Deron Eriksson <deroneriksson@gmail.com
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','deroneriksson@gmail.com');>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > Thank you for your patience. For release candidate validation, would it
>> be
>> > acceptable and helpful to reduce the dist artifacts to the following
>> with
>> > their accompanying signature files? It would be nice if we could include
>> > the binary distribution with dependencies. This would reduce the dist
>> > artifacts from 9 to 4.
>> >
>> > Source distribution:
>> > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.tar.gz
>> > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-src.zip
>> >
>> > Binary distribution with dependencies:
>> > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-standalone.tar.gz
>> > systemml-0.11.0-incubating-standalone.zip
>> >
>> >
>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/systemml/0.
>> 11.0-incubating-rc5/
>> >
>> > Thank you,
>> > Deron
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 9:06 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1975@gmail.com
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','luckbr1975@gmail.com');>>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 7:36 PM, Justin Mclean <
>> justin@classsoftware.com
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','justin@classsoftware.com');>>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Hi,
>> > > >
>> > > > > I understand that the most important thing for Apache is the
>> source
>> > > > release
>> > > > > artifact, but that does not prohibit a project from distributing
>> > > > > convenience binaries as long as they meet all the legal
>> requirements
>> > > > > mandated by Apache.
>> > > >
>> > > > Which is fine but currently it is not clear (to an external person)
>> > > > exactly what is what in that directory and the VOTE email doesn’t
>> > clarify
>> > > > it.
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > Yes, it's a bit confusing, so maybe it's a matter of adding a README
>> to
>> > > clarify what are the artifacts being released.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > >
>> > > > > Also, the release structure hasn't changed much from
>> > > > > our previous release
>> > > >
>> > > > Which I asked about the last RC and got no reply. I took a guess but
>> > > still
>> > > > not sure if it was right or not and if everything got reviewed.
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > Sorry for not getting back to you on the list of artifacts, I have
>> > > documented them on the following thread on the SystemML mailing list:
>> > > https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@systemml.incubator.apache.
>> > > org/msg01121.html
>> > >
>> > > Also, from previous RC the community removed one jar from the release
>> > > (*-standalone.jar) and all other artifacts were reviewed by the
>> SystemML
>> > > podling members. We are also looking into reducing the number of
>> > > distributed artifacts for our next release which should avoid further
>> > > confusion on the matter.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > > Thanks,
>> > > > Justin
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Luciano Resende
>> > > http://twitter.com/lresende1975
>> > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>


-- 
Sent from my Mobile device

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message