incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Niclas Hedhman <nic...@hedhman.org>
Subject Re: SGA vs CCLA
Date Wed, 30 Nov 2016 06:38:23 GMT
Ok, just wanted to make sure...

Why isn't my memory updated with "svn commit" ?? Yeah, the CCLA was updated
in 2005 with the appendix to make the grant specific.

Never mind...

On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 12:13 PM, Craig Russell <craig.russell@oracle.com>
wrote:

> Hi Niclas,
>
> The CCLA is sufficient as a code grant for new code bases coming into
> Apache. Of course, committers must submit their own ICLA as well.
>
> Why do you consider the CCLA a ‘weak’ agreement?
>
> Craig
>
> > On Nov 29, 2016, at 8:04 PM, Niclas Hedhman <niclas@hedhman.org> wrote:
> >
> > I am seeing on
> > http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#initial-import-code-dump
> > that the CCLA is adequate for new codebases coming in via the Incubator.
> Is
> > that really the case? It seems to me to be a rather 'weak' agreement for
> > something that substantial.
> >
> >
> > Cheers
> > --
> > Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
> > http://zest.apache.org - New Energy for Java
>
> Craig L Russell
> Secretary, Apache Software Foundation
> clr@apache.org http://db.apache.org/jdo
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>


-- 
Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
http://zest.apache.org - New Energy for Java

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message