incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Policy Question: GA for GitHub for Podlings
Date Mon, 07 Nov 2016 23:26:11 GMT
It does, Joe, but the IPMC needs to decide whether to even *ask* ... It is
an entirely reasonable position to say that focusing primary development at
GitHub could hurt some aspect of ASF-style community building, and (thus)
the IPMC does not want to allow that.

Infra will start with OpenWhisk (if it becomes a podling and the IPMC
agrees with its plan). We'll examine if/how to expand the experiment to
future podlings, as requested.

So with my IPMC hat on: +1 to both.
With my Infra hat on: +1 has already been given to #1. #2 is TBD.

Cheers,
-g

On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 5:07 PM, Joe Schaefer <joesuf4@gmail.com> wrote:

> With regard to the second question I hope the ultimate decision still rests
> with Greg.  This idea is fairly new and some baby steps are in order before
> opening the floodgates.
>
> IMO
>
> On Monday, November 7, 2016, Chris Mattmann <mattmann@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > As some of you may have seen the OpenWhisk podling being discussed now
> has
> > requested to use GitHub as its primary master. Greg Stein our ASF Infra
> > Admin
> > has OK’ed this for OpenWhisk iff the IPMC is OK with it.
> >
> > I ask now:
> >
> > 1. Is the IPMC OK with this for OpenWhisk?
> > 2. Is the IPMC OK with this in general availability for Podlings?
> >
> > I am +1 on both (IPMC hat on).
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Chris
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > <javascript:;>
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> > <javascript:;>
> >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message