Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAOqetn8_AY9pB8_00BC_z6BCXxFzrfoiYCewWmG=s=6r=xV=vw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKBQfzS0EvvYsTBUeS+qwzgFMr4Ht+y9-LuxTgLK0WDZBta3Rw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOqetn-KfE5K4hSkazY_sqPngbushaQOOXinWkUz_oXseYCgng@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAN1-RDP-m-xgeUF7RE9j-zM2oaiRzMJdK=+0tpo-H_BdNLbF3A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAKBQfzS04jb=DNjt+=Yr=AQCvL5wdASxAvJm9Cck=GkMTWFdiA@mail.gmail.com> <CAOqetn8_AY9pB8_00BC_z6BCXxFzrfoiYCewWmG=s=6r=xV=vw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Frank McQuillan <fmcquillan@pivotal.io>
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 17:41:39 -0700
Message-ID: <CAKBQfzQ0bn3zHN=m2WDbmz+8PUBjieNqbRdLNwq=ymB9z0CEFQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] MADlib v1.9.1-rc2
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114c908e092bda053bf44b0e
archived-at: Thu, 08 Sep 2016 00:41:46 -0000

--001a114c908e092bda053bf44b0e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

John,

src/utils files were in the original commit by Roman when we brought the
files into ASF:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-madlib/commit/a6acafdd54bd5e5d53ac3b7fb4b6621c042af460#diff-600376dffeb79835ede4a0b285078036
and they have not been changed since that time.

tag: a6acafdd54bd5e5d53ac3b7fb4b6621c042af460

So I do not believe any changes to NOTICE/LICENSE are required for src/utils

Frank


On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 5:28 PM, John D. Ament <johndament@apache.org> wrote:

> On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 8:01 PM Frank McQuillan <fmcquillan@pivotal.io>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi John,
> >
> > Thanks for reviewing the release.
> >
> > Regarding the exclusion list, during the first Apache incubator release
> for
> > MADlib 1.9 alpha, there was a legal-discuss thread on how to proceed with
> > headers that came from pre-Apache days when MADlib was under a 2-clause
> BSD
> > license.
> >
> > The agreement was to add them to the exclusion list as per:
> > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/
> > 201603.mbox/%3C9D1AF43C-370B-4E58-B0EF-2E29D242F50B%40jaguNET.com%3E
> > which we have done for the prior 2 releases.  So for this 3rd release we
> > did the same.
> >
>
> Ok, that clarifies part of it.  I don't see a call out for src/utils.  Why
> are those in the exclusion list and will you be updating NOTICE/LICENSE?
>
>
> >
> > Please let me know if you have any questions on this.
> >
> > Frank
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Rahul Iyer <rahulriyer@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >  Hi John,
> > >
> > > We've uploaded the KEYS file to apache dist
> > > <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/madlib/KEYS> and
> > didn't
> > > use any public server for the previous 2 releases.
> > >
> > > I've uploaded my key (which was used for the signature) to
> > keyservers.net
> > > and should be available now after you update your local cache. Is this
> > the
> > > Apache recommended server to use?
> > >
> > > - Rahul
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 1:53 PM, John D. Ament <johndament@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'm getting a problem with your key.  Can you look at it and tell me
> if
> > > you
> > > > think the issue's on my end?
> > > >
> > > > Johns-MBP-2:Downloads johnament$ gpg --verify
> > > > apache-madlib-1.9.1-incubating-source.tar.gz.asc
> > > > gpg: assuming signed data in 'apache-madlib-1.9.1-
> > > > incubating-source.tar.gz'
> > > > gpg: Signature made Fri Sep  2 12:05:14 2016 EDT using RSA key ID
> > > 6C725F40
> > > > gpg: requesting key 6C725F40 from hkps server
> > > hkps.pool.sks-keyservers.net
> > > > gpgkeys: key 52B795C96C725F40 not found on keyserver
> > > > gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found.
> > > > gpg: Total number processed: 0
> > > > gpg: keyserver communications error: Not found
> > > > gpg: keyserver communications error: Bad public key
> > > > gpg: Can't check signature: No public key
> > > >
> > > > Do I need to import your KEYS file or is your key uploaded to a
> public
> > > > server?
> > > >
> > > > John
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 12:40 AM Frank McQuillan <
> fmcquillan@pivotal.io
> > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hello Incubator PMC,
> > > > >
> > > > > The Apache MADlib (incubating) community has voted on and approved
> > the
> > > > > proposal to release MADlib v1.9.1-rc2.
> > > > >
> > > > > The voting result is available at:
> > > > >
> > > > > https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-madlib-
> > > > dev/201609.mbox/%3CCAKBQfzT0pw1%3DP-KWuZVsAwORdHdz792WvUtR-DbM%
> > > > 2BH8EkiZdSA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> > > > >
> > > > > This is the 3rd release for Apache MADlib (incubating).
> > > > >
> > > > > The main goals of this release are:
> > > > > * new modules (1-class SVM for novelty detection, prediction
> metrics,
> > > > > sessionization, pivoting)
> > > > > * improvements to existing modules (class weights in SVM,
> overlapping
> > > > > patterns in path)
> > > > > * performance improvements (path)
> > > > > * platform updates (PostgreSQL 9.5 and 9.6)
> > > > > * bug fixes
> > > > > * doc improvements
> > > > >
> > > > > For more information including release notes, please see:
> > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MADLIB/MADlib+1.9.1
> > > > >
> > > > > To run check RAT, please do:
> > > > >
> > > > > $mvn verify
> > > > >
> > > > > first to get the correct RAT output.  Look inside of pom.xml to see
> > the
> > > > > classes of exceptions we're managing there for RAT.
> > > > >
> > > > > We're voting on the source (tag):
> > > > > rc/1.9.1-rc2
> > > > >
> > > > > Source Files:
> > > > >
> > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/madlib/1.9.
> > > > 1-incubating-rc2
> > > > >
> > > > > Commit to be voted upon:
> > > > >
> > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-madlib.
> > > > git;a=commit;h=e1c99c1538dc124c9b323ba76382ba2af05c6892
> > > > >
> > > > > KEYS file containing PGP Keys we use to sign the release:
> > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/madlib/KEYS
> > > > >
> > > > > Please vote:
> > > > >
> > > > > [ ] +1  approve
> > > > > [ ] +0  no opinion
> > > > > [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> > > > >
> > > > > *** The vote will be open until Friday Sept 9 at 6 pm Pacific time.
> > ***
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

--001a114c908e092bda053bf44b0e--