Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80B18200B9C for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2016 07:52:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 7F37C160AE2; Mon, 26 Sep 2016 05:52:13 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id B9BF3160ACE for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2016 07:52:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 79676 invoked by uid 500); 26 Sep 2016 05:52:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 79665 invoked by uid 99); 26 Sep 2016 05:52:11 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 26 Sep 2016 05:52:11 +0000 Received: from mail-wm0-f44.google.com (mail-wm0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id DA2361A01E3 for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2016 05:52:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm0-f44.google.com with SMTP id l132so129321307wmf.1 for ; Sun, 25 Sep 2016 22:52:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwNJE1/06ubZ9bYaOlO13Nxc+6sTebL2DWkIscZh4+AyqXLtIWTWjxRu/usd1/OtpGYhYV+UE+2nBHtAdw== X-Received: by 10.195.10.132 with SMTP id ea4mr20035144wjd.19.1474869129049; Sun, 25 Sep 2016 22:52:09 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.28.139.207 with HTTP; Sun, 25 Sep 2016 22:52:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1423019168.2058021.1474443275667@mail.yahoo.com> <759455278.36082.1474702678001@mail.yahoo.com> <8503880b-0dbe-d52c-44d7-e74dd77e23c4@apache.org> <1674e36d-1b3b-a949-27e9-e5f6d242428c@shanecurcuru.org> From: Bertrand Delacretaz Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 07:52:08 +0200 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: Preliminary NetBeans cost findings To: Incubator General Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 archived-at: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 05:52:13 -0000 On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 5:57 AM, David Nalley wrote: > ...My guess is, based on Daniels estimate, that > first year is 13-30k - each year thereafter is 3-10k per year in costs.. Are these estimates sufficient for our infra team to give us their ok to proceed with the NetBeans vote, or do you guys need more time? I'm asking because a) discussions about the current proposal are currently going into all kinds of side tracks which are not really useful as far as informing the NetBeans vote decision, IMO and b) as it's the first time we do such an assessment for an incoming podling, IMO we shouldn't make NetBeans wait more than strictly needed, while we refine this costing thing internally. So my suggestion is for infra (David or Greg) to give us their ok to proceed with the vote if you guys agree, and sort out the (important) budget details internally in parallel. -Bertrand --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org