Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBB8F200B80 for ; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 22:15:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id B894E160AB4; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 20:15:04 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id D76E7160AB3 for ; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 22:15:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 36294 invoked by uid 500); 14 Sep 2016 20:15:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 36280 invoked by uid 99); 14 Sep 2016 20:15:02 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 20:15:02 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id CCDF8C0819 for ; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 20:15:01 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 3.576 X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.576 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=2.397, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=googlemail.com Received: from mx2-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AYnyWxHCBkkW for ; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 20:14:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qk0-f180.google.com (mail-qk0-f180.google.com [209.85.220.180]) by mx2-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx2-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 8C6115F246 for ; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 20:14:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qk0-f180.google.com with SMTP id t7so26695091qkh.2 for ; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 13:14:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=1uE1ayzPQx8l7Ko2DZD+3CBscR2ELzb/uAy3zXZ0+30=; b=K5Da7RklarRpyPoAmMy00BAwm3n84869PvxMe4qDt+4pE7orDxOHo8zA0XiibM815f 4IDJ1Zq+cTtcB2cSwCijNQgqTJIk2dp+4VXVjWInD86itbjtKFMChG57g8fYIyRhs53a 1/ufCN8Nv8S9kfiQv0iriBemJxcP9EYWpx1X3BNZhh7Git3sexO7h6DCavFBTjggknuK i1Kb15+zFjdUvXX7KvK6g8P2Jk7qJcrFnEeb3Z6NIrCEubDe8YBjEDGjk9Q7kl2ZLVDi shQcW1YlDd49HZt6xpPjlaXmYE3ZGP/Li8TDkRbQKGZvDxGOCbE5VfQv1GPsYKpv4jce LgxQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=1uE1ayzPQx8l7Ko2DZD+3CBscR2ELzb/uAy3zXZ0+30=; b=ApFmj5djynv/XU+dZPkhbwboikJuJv9hwPAf8fvdTXVWBTGuMqeSZnJoICh1MOSEXN jnGD6HLNQcArDxWGdDasWNM8qvDMY5M/7ykADuVY60kzk7btF9jGVpEEHjd+2RpL8LzB OkrTIvGj4IB+aYl1Ho9JY9XbSe+B0p/j8GxxWEYa/ho2WauL2JUGfZg5ulDeh4ORcf0T 0xDGDqx86P/HLcB0Po14becpuAg6HIz0yk30lt5rS9raFgvUKS0lRnlhO1aVM0k2nPvA b3ZNFGTaNP4O0pdJ9PqRaTsjEUsd09QClYv0y35pqRGYnBpCFCDTkdeAAAl2wn3qHQ/d +XVQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwODBcE/TT1Ljs6qr62D7PVbdEyIVKtFXiHcYIzGeAN11UXz2tzq8AsMKwB6pJ7sTLe78Dgvfh7QYDxACA== X-Received: by 10.55.144.71 with SMTP id s68mr5265958qkd.62.1473884093024; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 13:14:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.55.167.70 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Sep 2016 13:14:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <563af786-3b43-0707-6de9-819ce4618f81@douma.nu> References: <30D9D819-73B8-47A2-871F-57F831EB2F8A@wadechandler.com> <563af786-3b43-0707-6de9-819ce4618f81@douma.nu> From: Geertjan Wielenga Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 22:14:52 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal To: general@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c083a88ce0f00053c7d617d archived-at: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 20:15:04 -0000 --94eb2c083a88ce0f00053c7d617d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Brilliant! On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 10:11 PM, Ate Douma wrote: > On 2016-09-14 21:49, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: > >> I can't wait for that to happen! In the meantime, can we call NetBeans b= y >> its real name: NetBeans, with an uppercase N and an uppercase B? Shall w= e >> all start maintaining that, i.e., using the correct name, which is >> NetBeans >> or, better yet, Apache NetBeans? >> > > Sorry, guilty as charged. And as a proposed mentor: double penalty :-) > I'll try to do better in the future! > > >> Yes, Oracle is handing over everything in terms of trademarks to Apache, >> let's put aside that discussion since it's true, if you can point in the >> proposal where this is not clear or can be clearer, tell me and we will >> change/add/whatever. FYI -- no one creating independent products based o= n >> Apache NetBeans cares what its name is. >> >> Only two things are in discussion right now: (1) licensing [which has be= en >> discussed quite a bit with Apache folks like Bertrand and Ate prior to t= he >> proposal being published and we are comfortable we'll be able to solve >> everything] and (2) infrastructure migration [which has been outlined >> already, though we are working on a lot more details at the moment so th= at >> everything will be crystal clear]. >> > > Cool! > > I think the proposal looks great and so far I see no issues to be > considered > blocking for entering the Incubator. > > Regards, Ate > > > >> Thanks, >> >> Geertjan >> >> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 8:40 PM, Roman Shaposhnik >> wrote: >> >> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 11:34 AM, Wade Chandler >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Do you mean from the stand point of it being a Java based application, >>>> >>> or that some how >>> >>>> NetBeans and the Java TCK are related? I don=E2=80=99t think either is= an impact >>>> >>> on NetBeans IMHO; >>> >>>> not any more than it is for the Eclipse IDE or IntelliJ. Do you mean >>>> >>> because it is being contributed >>> >>>> by Oracle perhaps? If so, does the donor have as much impact on >>>> >>> contributions as that once >>> >>>> adopted by Apache? I may be misunderstanding what you are asking. I am >>>> >>> not an employee >>> >>>> of Oracle; just an NB contributor. >>>> >>> >>> I think the question is more along the lines of what else would be >>> required to produce a "canonical" >>> release of Apache Netbeans. If everything that is required is being >>> donated -- I think we're good. >>> IOW, the project must be self-contained and not depend on anything >>> still left behind the firewall >>> to do on-going development and most important releases. E.g. if I send >>> you a patch -- you can't >>> reject it on the grounds that some test behind Oracle's frewall I've >>> never seen failed. Stuff like >>> that. >>> >>> On a related note, I haven't seen it explicitly mentioned in the >>> proposal, but I hope you guys do >>> realize that once this project is accepted the Netbeans brand belongs >>> to Apache. IOW, if Oracle >>> or anybody else ever want to have an independent product based on >>> Apache Netbeans they will >>> have to call it something else. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Roman. >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org >>> >>> >>> >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org > > --94eb2c083a88ce0f00053c7d617d--