Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: shaposhnik@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <CAD8z1JL1MfXfdgSOHCSsMKKTaMdWMqch6uAZE+dtjs2dM943YA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAD8z1JJsx_R8fSVUKGE_gU0+ppF3U=WnuFcTzXzQUghdrLcKpQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <FD7C02F9-C568-4A1D-8ADA-1B2F8AE55309@classsoftware.com> <CAD8z1JK9WSmJ1v-nvjo7c9FQQ5VXhp+jEEUnWfsZQiDcrGOOZg@mail.gmail.com>
 <69F41AE1-2E1D-4043-842A-B8414F47ECD8@classsoftware.com> <CAD8z1JL1MfXfdgSOHCSsMKKTaMdWMqch6uAZE+dtjs2dM943YA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Roman Shaposhnik <roman@shaposhnik.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 14:10:09 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+ULb+tWurx7R2kohDh4MjQ9vh-yN9h-KCQnBr69xAtQnCScHg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PredictionIO 0.10.0 (incubating) RC4
To: "general@incubator.apache.org" <general@incubator.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
archived-at: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 21:10:23 -0000

On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 2:06 PM, Donald Szeto <donald@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Justin,
>
> Sounds good. Since a vote usually take 72 hours, is it okay in practice to
> "pipeline them"? What I mean is to let the current IPMC vote sits here,
> while the project PMC creates a new RC and start voting on it? Or must they
> be mutually exclusive, i.e. only one could exist at any time? I am curious
> of this possibility to shorten release cycle time.

It will be much less confusing if the previous RC VOTE was canceled.

Thanks,
Roman.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org