incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Henry Saputra <henry.sapu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Olympian Incubation Proposal
Date Fri, 30 Sep 2016 02:57:26 GMT
With obvious block due to Datastax response, shall I CLOSE this DISCUSS
thread until further updates, if any?

On Thursday, September 29, 2016, P. Taylor Goetz <ptgoetz@gmail.com> wrote:

> For the record I'd be -1 as well unless DataStax chose to support it.
>
> I would like to give them time to change their mind though.
>
> -Taylor
>
> > On Sep 29, 2016, at 10:37 PM, Greg Stein <gstein@gmail.com
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >
> >> On Sep 29, 2016 19:22, "P. Taylor Goetz" <ptgoetz@gmail.com
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >> ...
> >> They can block a move to the ASF, but they can’t block a fork of the
> > project moving elsewhere. Strong communities will regroup and live on.
> > DataStax' reluctance to allow it could very easily be interpreted as a
> > rejection of the ASF governance model or the Foundation itself.
> >
> > Yes, the community could certainly launch their fork at GitHub or some
> > such. DataStax provided them with that ability via the ALv2 license. The
> > ASF is not a necessary step for that community.
> >
> >> ...
> >> Can we wait and see if DataStax is willing to do the right thing before
> > shooting down the proposal as a hostile fork?
> >
> > My vote remains -1. That can change, based on their choices.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > -g
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> <javascript:;>
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> <javascript:;>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message