incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Emilian Bold <emilian.b...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Radical proposal: no initial list of committers
Date Tue, 27 Sep 2016 12:01:08 GMT
Considering the effort that went into this and the fact that we had just
reached a point where we could move on past this list, I hope you start
using this new rule for the next project submitted.

Pe marți, 27 septembrie 2016, Greg Stein <gstein@gmail.com> a scris:

> The NetBeans proposal (among many others in the past) has demonstrated a
> significant "problem" with trying to establish an appropriate list of
> initial committers. There are many people that want to be on, for various
> reasons. Because they are committers, recent or historic. Or they want the
> "prestige" to be there. Some people believe they "deserve" to be on the
> list. etc etc
>
> Establishing the list is particularly difficult for large and old
> communities.
>
> But. What if we just said "no such list" ?
>
> This will shift the initial voting of committers upon the Champion/Mentors
> who will construct the entirety of the PPMC. But hey: aren't they supposed
> to be involved? Aren't they supposed to demonstrate how to earn merit, and
> the committership that results?
>
> This would also solve the problem of initial committers that have not
> established any merit whatsoever. We've had many situations where people
> simply add themselves to the list. Why? Cuz they chose to do so. It is sort
> of silently allowed for IPMC members to add themselves. "I wanna join!"
> BAM. It happens.
>
> So yeah. Radical thought: NO initial list. The PPMC is just the Champion +
> Mentors. They will build the committers and PPMC according to merit. (note:
> this could be *very* fast for a particular few highly-engaged with bringing
> the project to the ASF)
>
> ???
>
> Cheers,
> -g
>


-- 

--emi

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message