incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Frank McQuillan <fmcquil...@pivotal.io>
Subject Re: [VOTE] MADlib v1.9.1-rc2
Date Mon, 12 Sep 2016 17:54:25 GMT
John/Justin,

Have the questions you asked been answered to your satisfaction?  Is there
any additional information we can provide for your review?

Frank

On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 4:56 PM, Orhan Kislal <okislal@pivotal.io> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> The changelist files take new names with every version and then get
> updated. These files do not have license headers (like the other old files)
> but they were part of the pre-Apache life of MADlib. I believe the
> confusion originates from using the regular "mv" command instead of "git
> mv".
>
> Thanks,
>
> Orhan
>
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Justin Mclean <justin@classsoftware.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > > The MADlib community is unclear on how to deal with the dual license.
> >
> > Well that makes two off us. :-)
> >
> > > Till now we've treated all *new* files (i.e. files that were created
> > > after joining Apache) as Apache license with required headers and all
> > > old files under the BSD.
> >
> > I can see several new files that don’t have Apache headers. For example
> > incubator-madlib-1.9.1/src/madpack/changelist_*_1.9.1.yaml
> >
> > > Is it recommended that we add the Apache header on any file that
> > > contains an edit (old or new)?
> >
> > The advice here [1] (see points 4 and 5) say only if the changes are
> > significant but it assumes that files have a license header in the first
> > place.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Justin
> >
> > 1.http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#3party
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message