incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Orhan Kislal <okis...@pivotal.io>
Subject Re: [VOTE] MADlib v1.9.1-rc2
Date Thu, 08 Sep 2016 01:13:56 GMT
John,

I know of this commit and I cannot see any distinction between the
src/utils folder and many other excluded folders. Here is the phrase from
the LICENSE file:

The rest of the source code, unless explicitly marked with an Apache License
header, should be assumed to be coming from previous life of MADlib as a
BSD licensed project and is available under the following license:
...

Thanks,

Orhan

On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 6:00 PM, John D. Ament <johndament@apache.org> wrote:

> Frank pointed me to this commit - which changes a bunch of things to Apache
> License:
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-madlib/commit/
> a6acafdd54bd5e5d53ac3b7fb4b6621c042af460#diff-
> 600376dffeb79835ede4a0b285078036
>
> John
>
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 8:58 PM Orhan Kislal <okislal@pivotal.io> wrote:
>
> > John,
> >
> > I am checking MADlib github page for the src/utils folder and it
> indicates
> > that the latest commits are from 4-5 years ago. Could you point us to the
> > commit tag that you mentioned?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Orhan
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 5:47 PM, John D. Ament <johndament@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Frank,
> > >
> > > Then those files should have Apache headers (they're not listed in the
> > > explicitly licensed area & are part of a commit that added apache
> > > headers).  Can you explain why you think they're not subject, or what
> > > license they're falling under?
> > >
> > > John
> > >
> > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 8:41 PM Frank McQuillan <fmcquillan@pivotal.io>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > John,
> > > >
> > > > src/utils files were in the original commit by Roman when we brought
> > the
> > > > files into ASF:
> > > >
> > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-madlib/commit/
> > > a6acafdd54bd5e5d53ac3b7fb4b6621c042af460#diff-
> > > 600376dffeb79835ede4a0b285078036
> > > > and they have not been changed since that time.
> > > >
> > > > tag: a6acafdd54bd5e5d53ac3b7fb4b6621c042af460
> > > >
> > > > So I do not believe any changes to NOTICE/LICENSE are required for
> > > > src/utils
> > > >
> > > > Frank
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 5:28 PM, John D. Ament <johndament@apache.org
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 8:01 PM Frank McQuillan <
> > fmcquillan@pivotal.io>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi John,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks for reviewing the release.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regarding the exclusion list, during the first Apache incubator
> > > release
> > > > > for
> > > > > > MADlib 1.9 alpha, there was a legal-discuss thread on how to
> > proceed
> > > > with
> > > > > > headers that came from pre-Apache days when MADlib was under
a
> > > 2-clause
> > > > > BSD
> > > > > > license.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The agreement was to add them to the exclusion list as per:
> > > > > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/
> > > > > >
> > 201603.mbox/%3C9D1AF43C-370B-4E58-B0EF-2E29D242F50B%40jaguNET.com%3E
> > > > > > which we have done for the prior 2 releases.  So for this 3rd
> > release
> > > > we
> > > > > > did the same.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Ok, that clarifies part of it.  I don't see a call out for
> src/utils.
> > > > Why
> > > > > are those in the exclusion list and will you be updating
> > > NOTICE/LICENSE?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Please let me know if you have any questions on this.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Frank
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Rahul Iyer <rahulriyer@gmail.com
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >  Hi John,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > We've uploaded the KEYS file to apache dist
> > > > > > > <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/madlib/KEYS>
> > and
> > > > > > didn't
> > > > > > > use any public server for the previous 2 releases.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I've uploaded my key (which was used for the signature)
to
> > > > > > keyservers.net
> > > > > > > and should be available now after you update your local
cache.
> Is
> > > > this
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > Apache recommended server to use?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > - Rahul
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 1:53 PM, John D. Ament <
> > > johndament@apache.org
> > > > >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I'm getting a problem with your key.  Can you look
at it and
> > tell
> > > > me
> > > > > if
> > > > > > > you
> > > > > > > > think the issue's on my end?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Johns-MBP-2:Downloads johnament$ gpg --verify
> > > > > > > > apache-madlib-1.9.1-incubating-source.tar.gz.asc
> > > > > > > > gpg: assuming signed data in 'apache-madlib-1.9.1-
> > > > > > > > incubating-source.tar.gz'
> > > > > > > > gpg: Signature made Fri Sep  2 12:05:14 2016 EDT using
RSA
> key
> > ID
> > > > > > > 6C725F40
> > > > > > > > gpg: requesting key 6C725F40 from hkps server
> > > > > > > hkps.pool.sks-keyservers.net
> > > > > > > > gpgkeys: key 52B795C96C725F40 not found on keyserver
> > > > > > > > gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found.
> > > > > > > > gpg: Total number processed: 0
> > > > > > > > gpg: keyserver communications error: Not found
> > > > > > > > gpg: keyserver communications error: Bad public key
> > > > > > > > gpg: Can't check signature: No public key
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Do I need to import your KEYS file or is your key
uploaded
> to a
> > > > > public
> > > > > > > > server?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > John
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 12:40 AM Frank McQuillan <
> > > > > fmcquillan@pivotal.io
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Hello Incubator PMC,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The Apache MADlib (incubating) community has
voted on and
> > > > approved
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > proposal to release MADlib v1.9.1-rc2.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The voting result is available at:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > https://mail-archives.apache.
> org/mod_mbox/incubator-madlib-
> > > > > > > > dev/201609.mbox/%3CCAKBQfzT0pw1%3DP-
> KWuZVsAwORdHdz792WvUtR-DbM%
> > > > > > > > 2BH8EkiZdSA%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > This is the 3rd release for Apache MADlib (incubating).
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > The main goals of this release are:
> > > > > > > > > * new modules (1-class SVM for novelty detection,
> prediction
> > > > > metrics,
> > > > > > > > > sessionization, pivoting)
> > > > > > > > > * improvements to existing modules (class weights
in SVM,
> > > > > overlapping
> > > > > > > > > patterns in path)
> > > > > > > > > * performance improvements (path)
> > > > > > > > > * platform updates (PostgreSQL 9.5 and 9.6)
> > > > > > > > > * bug fixes
> > > > > > > > > * doc improvements
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > For more information including release notes,
please see:
> > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MADLIB/
> > > MADlib+1.9.1
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > To run check RAT, please do:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > $mvn verify
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > first to get the correct RAT output.  Look inside
of
> pom.xml
> > to
> > > > see
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > classes of exceptions we're managing there for
RAT.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > We're voting on the source (tag):
> > > > > > > > > rc/1.9.1-rc2
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Source Files:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/
> dist/dev/incubator/madlib/1.9.
> > > > > > > > 1-incubating-rc2
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Commit to be voted upon:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-madlib
> .
> > > > > > > > git;a=commit;h=e1c99c1538dc124c9b323ba76382ba2af05c6892
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > KEYS file containing PGP Keys we use to sign
the release:
> > > > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/
> dist/dev/incubator/madlib/KEYS
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Please vote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > [ ] +1  approve
> > > > > > > > > [ ] +0  no opinion
> > > > > > > > > [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > *** The vote will be open until Friday Sept 9
at 6 pm
> Pacific
> > > > time.
> > > > > > ***
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message