incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ate Douma <...@douma.nu>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal
Date Wed, 14 Sep 2016 20:11:45 GMT
On 2016-09-14 21:49, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
> I can't wait for that to happen! In the meantime, can we call NetBeans by
> its real name: NetBeans, with an uppercase N and an uppercase B? Shall we
> all start maintaining that, i.e., using the correct name, which is NetBeans
> or, better yet, Apache NetBeans?

Sorry, guilty as charged. And as a proposed mentor: double penalty :-)
I'll try to do better in the future!

>
> Yes, Oracle is handing over everything in terms of trademarks to Apache,
> let's put aside that discussion since it's true, if you can point in the
> proposal where this is not clear or can be clearer, tell me and we will
> change/add/whatever. FYI -- no one creating independent products based on
> Apache NetBeans cares what its name is.
>
> Only two things are in discussion right now: (1) licensing [which has been
> discussed quite a bit with Apache folks like Bertrand and Ate prior to the
> proposal being published and we are comfortable we'll be able to solve
> everything] and (2) infrastructure migration [which has been outlined
> already, though we are working on a lot more details at the moment so that
> everything will be crystal clear].

Cool!

I think the proposal looks great and so far I see no issues to be considered
blocking for entering the Incubator.

Regards, Ate

>
> Thanks,
>
> Geertjan
>
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 8:40 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <roman@shaposhnik.org>
> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 11:34 AM, Wade Chandler
>> <consult@wadechandler.com> wrote:
>>> Do you mean from the stand point of it being a Java based application,
>> or that some how
>>> NetBeans and the Java TCK are related? I don’t think either is an impact
>> on NetBeans IMHO;
>>> not any more than it is for the Eclipse IDE or IntelliJ. Do you mean
>> because it is being contributed
>>> by Oracle perhaps? If so, does the donor have as much impact on
>> contributions as that once
>>> adopted by Apache? I may be misunderstanding what you are asking. I am
>> not an employee
>>> of Oracle; just an NB contributor.
>>
>> I think the question is more along the lines of what else would be
>> required to produce a "canonical"
>> release of Apache Netbeans. If everything that is required is being
>> donated -- I think we're good.
>> IOW, the project must be self-contained and not depend on anything
>> still left behind the firewall
>> to do on-going development and most important releases. E.g. if I send
>> you a patch -- you can't
>> reject it on the grounds that some test behind Oracle's frewall I've
>> never seen failed. Stuff like
>> that.
>>
>> On a related note, I haven't seen it explicitly  mentioned in the
>> proposal, but I hope you guys do
>> realize that once this project is accepted the Netbeans brand belongs
>> to Apache. IOW, if Oracle
>> or anybody else ever want to have an independent product based on
>> Apache Netbeans they will
>> have to call it something else.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Roman.
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
>



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org


Mime
View raw message