Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAOqetn_hiBTnFp1-0tOz56cTTqoPpUZY3c+pxqTDX6n1uBebLw@mail.gmail.com>
 <1283912466.10876778.1470642412273.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
 <CAOqetn91O8s+K+F1i9xgkoZaFtA_sCo1vDf6kkhUH_aFoqoknw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CACLE=7MQuGFG80yr0dir+rppLEnWDXU+QKwMk-=Jn0s6OsOZQQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOqetn-TwNPd8202WEA-T5aB8kEgSgR5aCexURgrrpHVEHwPkg@mail.gmail.com>
 <9367e1d0-8ed9-bfe9-fa63-e1facdd65220@nanthrax.net> <CACLE=7MEjUZ5cGygOLma2a3O9SUKy4GX7ctvypu1D15=2yCKuw@mail.gmail.com>
 <16D3E313-1D9F-44FD-BC97-771AF27C2901@yahoo.de>
In-Reply-To: <16D3E313-1D9F-44FD-BC97-771AF27C2901@yahoo.de>
From: "John D. Ament" <john.d.ament@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2016 20:55:52 +0000
Message-ID: <CAOqetn_YY1PH-h9ftmpXhF0bbEe9491mMixWoxcbTDu4fpQPoQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: [DISCUSS] BatchEE Graduation Trajectory
To: general@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113f1dace1f47d053995a464
archived-at: Mon, 08 Aug 2016 20:56:08 -0000

--001a113f1dace1f47d053995a464
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Changing the title to clarify what we're talking about now.

John

On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 4:48 PM Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de.invalid>
wrote:

> Given that Geronimo is nowadays more a kind of =E2=80=9EEE commons=E2=80=
=9C, it might fit
> in there.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
> > Am 08.08.2016 um 22:32 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.co=
m
> >:
> >
> > Le 8 ao=C3=BBt 2016 21:04, "Jean-Baptiste Onofr=C3=A9" <jb@nanthrax.net=
> a =C3=A9crit :
> >>
> >> Hi John,
> >>
> >> I've probably missed your ping. That's right that last month I didn't
> > sign for two reasons:
> >> 1. the report was empty
> >> 2. I don't see lot of activity on the BatchEE project:
> >> 2.1. There are some commits (
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-batchee/commits/master) but not
> super
> > active
> >> 2.2. Same for the mailing lists:
> >>  http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-batchee-user/
> >>  http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-batchee-dev/
> >>
> >> I'm not sure that BatchEE can be a project by its own as I'm not sure =
we
> > have a community around (especially an user community).
> >
> > To be honest got very various feesback from tomcat, standalone and tome=
e
> > users. Putting batchee behind tomee or geronimo would kill the remainin=
g
> > 66% of users IMO and the community would be quite weird or not
> > heterogeneous at least (so not a real one). That to say i have a very
> mixes
> > feeling about umbrella projects.
> >
> >> I agree with Romain that BatchEE could be part of a kind of umbrella
> > project.
> >> If we have good sign that we have an user community around, then it
> makes
> > sense to discuss about graduation.
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> JB
> >>
> >>
> >> On 08/08/2016 05:57 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Romain,
> >>>
> >>> I've actually been pushing to get BatchEE to graduate for some time.
> > IMHO
> >>> there's no more benefit in the incubator for you guys.
> >>>
> >>> I'm pointing out the issue, as last month a mentor refused sign off d=
ue
> > to
> >>> lack of content in your report.  The current report doesn't seem to b=
e
> > much
> >>> better.  I pinged JB off list, so far no answer there either.
> >>>
> >>> - John
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 11:49 AM Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibucau@gmail.com
> >>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi John,
> >>>>
> >>>> Think we can be blamed to not have answered you but we took actions =
in
> >>>> general. That said Mark was more pointing out that if there are issu=
es
> > with
> >>>> the content it should probably be sent to batchee too explaining why
> and
> >>>> what is expected/how we can enhance it. Typically this time you
> pointed
> > out
> >>>> it was "too empty" for you but I'm not sure there is a list I'm not
> > aware
> >>>> of but it would have been completely silently ignored cause batchee@
> >>>> wouldn't have been notified of that.
> >>>>
> >>>> More generally it is quite hard to fill this report for stable
> projects
> >>>> (which doesn't mean they are not alive but just they are stable enou=
gh
> > to
> >>>> not get as much activity as BigData projects ;)). I'm not sure we
> should
> >>>> group them either in a new umbrella project or an existing one -
> > typically
> >>>> we could create an inconsistent bucket in term of user communities b=
ut
> >>>> consistent in term of maintainers/asf guys - or just keep it like th=
at
> > but
> >>>> this "issue" will come back regularly I think and it would be great =
to
> >>>> "skip" these round trips if possible and have a clear statement abou=
t
> >>>> projects having by design an irregular activity - thinking to EE
> > projects
> >>>> which have a big activity after spec releases then mainly just
> > maintenance
> >>>> until next round.
> >>>>
> >>>> You probably guessed that I would love to avoid to let small project=
s
> be
> >>>> swallowed by bigger projects to skip this kind of lifecycle/activity
> > issue
> >>>> and avoid to create inconsistent (user) communities but I have to
> admit
> > I
> >>>> don't have a good view of the incubator freedom we can have on that
> > area.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
> >>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> >>>> <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Wordpress Blog
> >>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> >>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> >>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
> >>>> <http://www.tomitribe.com> | JavaEE Factory
> >>>> <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>
> >>>>
> >>>> 2016-08-08 17:22 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament <johndament@apache.org>:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 3:47 AM Mark Struberg
> <struberg@yahoo.de.invalid
> >>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> John, others. Would you please also add in the BatchEE amendments =
I
> > did
> >>>>>> today.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> Next time a draft is sent, it will be picked up (its just copy and
> >>>>
> >>>> paste).
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> The feedback mechanism is great but we could improve this by also
> >>>>
> >>>> sending
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> a mail to the respective podling if you have feedback.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I know that I've personally sent feedback/questions to BatchEE
> before,
> >>>>> without any response from the podling.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/262e43b2bb49d1ef5058a74f43b4f7
> >>>>> c1e4ec6b9fb4f5896d28e95918@%3Cdev.batchee.apache.org%3E
> >>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/044be9dc4b10136a7025ca5e031b33
> >>>>> 12e2dee8b93680483a754b594e@%3Cdev.batchee.apache.org%3E
> >>>>>
> >>>>> - John
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> That way we could fix left-overs and missed paragraphs much easier=
.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> txs and LieGrue,
> >>>>>> strub
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Jean-Baptiste Onofr=C3=A9
> >> jbonofre@apache.org
> >> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> >> Talend - http://www.talend.com
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>

--001a113f1dace1f47d053995a464--