Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89D2C200B59 for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 10:06:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 88A6C160A91; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 08:06:24 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id CD6EF160A8F for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 10:06:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 7229 invoked by uid 500); 8 Aug 2016 08:06:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 7218 invoked by uid 99); 8 Aug 2016 08:06:17 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Aug 2016 08:06:17 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.36] (dk.quenda.co [90.184.204.23]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id 3AAE61A00C5 for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 08:06:17 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] move the Incubator Report section to SVN or GIT? To: general@incubator.apache.org References: <136988465.10970892.1470641327179.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <136988465.10970892.1470641327179.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> <394802271.10829333.1470641661498.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> From: Daniel Gruno Message-ID: <7dd6fe9c-1533-d0fd-92af-13cf6d7841e2@apache.org> Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2016 10:06:14 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit archived-at: Mon, 08 Aug 2016 08:06:24 -0000 On 08/08/2016 10:03 AM, Christopher wrote: > On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 3:34 AM Mark Struberg > wrote: > >> Another possible option would be to move it to our CMS. >> >> That would bring us SVN for the people who prefer vi, but also a graphical >> UI for editing. >> And it would make people make familiar with our CMS. > > > I prefer the Wiki over CMS. I find CMS to be clumsy and annoying. I'm glad > the projects I'm involved in no longer use (or never have used) it. I'd be > willing to use SVN (reluctantly, and with git-svn), but if it were tied to > CMS, there'd still be the second publication step using CMS which would be > annoying. > > There is something to be said about the low barrier to entry of a Wiki, > though. Anybody can do it. It's the least developer-centric way of doing > things out there. I know CMS tries to be that, but it hasn't quite > succeeded. > Why not make a whimsy-like application for this? That would ensure that you are only meddling with the specific sub-section of the report you are working on, and would allow multiple people to work on the report at the same time, maybe even have a simple sign-off button for mentors? Shouldn't take long to make that :) With regards, Daniel. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org