Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDE44200B59 for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 22:48:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id EC673160A91; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 20:48:34 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 15B6B160A77 for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 22:48:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 95964 invoked by uid 500); 8 Aug 2016 20:48:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact general-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list general@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 95951 invoked by uid 99); 8 Aug 2016 20:48:27 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Aug 2016 20:48:27 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 404CB1809A5 for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 20:48:27 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.979 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.979 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, KAM_ASCII_DIVIDERS=0.8, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd3-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=yahoo.de Received: from mx2-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zF3BVOohdrcj for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 20:48:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nm8-vm5.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (nm8-vm5.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com [98.138.91.230]) by mx2-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx2-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 4FD5E5F39C for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 20:48:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [98.138.101.132] by nm8.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 08 Aug 2016 20:48:18 -0000 Received: from [98.138.226.63] by tm20.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 08 Aug 2016 20:48:18 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp214.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 08 Aug 2016 20:44:16 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 941919.2560.bm@smtp214.mail.ne1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: W6Lo_l8VM1lQ9GyDFTMqo3tSjPTV27qMwr6KZzdQ13FvaDJ x4rqKJ7LULLVe8qSf6By8rHAnHC5xZrbQclYe_zoG_iSon5YPj0K7SH5jDyn 4j2QfXMkLrLjFvl0yljVSWS.RIAafIfBYpwzH.o12qrnASv_7SRoHXrsJ8_e ectpazfM29MyVctHG1m7vgoI3II7oPI0IOKOdVOKIgfYqqEFFaELQsxiLD65 ucQj149OXYcl5jfaEpvByEjg4J8aDe8p3dm9iPZanERrvKPczvHtSVkADZ41 Ky6eFJJ0qSoKpoSgC8zXuZ_iG.RDhjyLMnUExV3CIOkE2Xad0f6Fmi62i8P5 uUX3U7wIrIv1pg_107yvNADLPkzGs_o8N0cLrFQNx9wrcPL28tzHqKi7cLSZ 3RabRGR.V2tqamUEXKrto7uqbsXchtKgd2YbOmIDIDZuHlF19ohgm2u.37vc yaug3gu.9W9wO8hATNAd99dNgqW8FsbJbLvG.iucX1IZxlXx3VpHavIM862b PR55bVvbsfNsniqoBrzqxVtNLD1ytUswO0EVMwFveIc5.5A-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: 81dhI.iswBBq7boyzRoOX6xuRIe8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) Subject: Re: [DRAFT] Incubator PMC Board Report - August 2016 From: Mark Struberg In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2016 22:48:16 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <16D3E313-1D9F-44FD-BC97-771AF27C2901@yahoo.de> References: <1283912466.10876778.1470642412273.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> <9367e1d0-8ed9-bfe9-fa63-e1facdd65220@nanthrax.net> To: general@incubator.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) archived-at: Mon, 08 Aug 2016 20:48:35 -0000 Given that Geronimo is nowadays more a kind of =E2=80=9EEE commons=E2=80=9C= , it might fit in there.=20 LieGrue, strub > Am 08.08.2016 um 22:32 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau = : >=20 > Le 8 ao=C3=BBt 2016 21:04, "Jean-Baptiste Onofr=C3=A9" = a =C3=A9crit : >>=20 >> Hi John, >>=20 >> I've probably missed your ping. That's right that last month I didn't > sign for two reasons: >> 1. the report was empty >> 2. I don't see lot of activity on the BatchEE project: >> 2.1. There are some commits ( > https://github.com/apache/incubator-batchee/commits/master) but not = super > active >> 2.2. Same for the mailing lists: >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-batchee-user/ >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-batchee-dev/ >>=20 >> I'm not sure that BatchEE can be a project by its own as I'm not sure = we > have a community around (especially an user community). >=20 > To be honest got very various feesback from tomcat, standalone and = tomee > users. Putting batchee behind tomee or geronimo would kill the = remaining > 66% of users IMO and the community would be quite weird or not > heterogeneous at least (so not a real one). That to say i have a very = mixes > feeling about umbrella projects. >=20 >> I agree with Romain that BatchEE could be part of a kind of umbrella > project. >> If we have good sign that we have an user community around, then it = makes > sense to discuss about graduation. >>=20 >> Regards >> JB >>=20 >>=20 >> On 08/08/2016 05:57 PM, John D. Ament wrote: >>>=20 >>> Romain, >>>=20 >>> I've actually been pushing to get BatchEE to graduate for some time. > IMHO >>> there's no more benefit in the incubator for you guys. >>>=20 >>> I'm pointing out the issue, as last month a mentor refused sign off = due > to >>> lack of content in your report. The current report doesn't seem to = be > much >>> better. I pinged JB off list, so far no answer there either. >>>=20 >>> - John >>>=20 >>> On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 11:49 AM Romain Manni-Bucau = >=20 >>> wrote: >>>=20 >>>> Hi John, >>>>=20 >>>> Think we can be blamed to not have answered you but we took actions = in >>>> general. That said Mark was more pointing out that if there are = issues > with >>>> the content it should probably be sent to batchee too explaining = why and >>>> what is expected/how we can enhance it. Typically this time you = pointed > out >>>> it was "too empty" for you but I'm not sure there is a list I'm not > aware >>>> of but it would have been completely silently ignored cause = batchee@ >>>> wouldn't have been notified of that. >>>>=20 >>>> More generally it is quite hard to fill this report for stable = projects >>>> (which doesn't mean they are not alive but just they are stable = enough > to >>>> not get as much activity as BigData projects ;)). I'm not sure we = should >>>> group them either in a new umbrella project or an existing one - > typically >>>> we could create an inconsistent bucket in term of user communities = but >>>> consistent in term of maintainers/asf guys - or just keep it like = that > but >>>> this "issue" will come back regularly I think and it would be great = to >>>> "skip" these round trips if possible and have a clear statement = about >>>> projects having by design an irregular activity - thinking to EE > projects >>>> which have a big activity after spec releases then mainly just > maintenance >>>> until next round. >>>>=20 >>>> You probably guessed that I would love to avoid to let small = projects be >>>> swallowed by bigger projects to skip this kind of = lifecycle/activity > issue >>>> and avoid to create inconsistent (user) communities but I have to = admit > I >>>> don't have a good view of the incubator freedom we can have on that > area. >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> Romain Manni-Bucau >>>> @rmannibucau | Blog >>>> | Old Wordpress Blog >>>> | Github < >>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> | >>>> LinkedIn | Tomitriber >>>> | JavaEE Factory >>>> >>>>=20 >>>> 2016-08-08 17:22 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament : >>>>=20 >>>>> On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 3:47 AM Mark Struberg = >=20 >>>>> wrote: >>>>>=20 >>>>>> John, others. Would you please also add in the BatchEE amendments = I > did >>>>>> today. >>>>>>=20 >>>>>>=20 >>>>> Next time a draft is sent, it will be picked up (its just copy and >>>>=20 >>>> paste). >>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>>> The feedback mechanism is great but we could improve this by also >>>>=20 >>>> sending >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> a mail to the respective podling if you have feedback. >>>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>> I know that I've personally sent feedback/questions to BatchEE = before, >>>>> without any response from the podling. >>>>>=20 >>>>> = https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/262e43b2bb49d1ef5058a74f43b4f7 >>>>> c1e4ec6b9fb4f5896d28e95918@%3Cdev.batchee.apache.org%3E >>>>> = https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/044be9dc4b10136a7025ca5e031b33 >>>>> 12e2dee8b93680483a754b594e@%3Cdev.batchee.apache.org%3E >>>>>=20 >>>>> - John >>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> That way we could fix left-overs and missed paragraphs much = easier. >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> txs and LieGrue, >>>>>> strub >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> = --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: = general-help@incubator.apache.org >>>>>>=20 >>>>>>=20 >>>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>=20 >>=20 >> -- >> Jean-Baptiste Onofr=C3=A9 >> jbonofre@apache.org >> http://blog.nanthrax.net >> Talend - http://www.talend.com >>=20 >>=20 >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org