incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache HAWQ (incubating) 2.0.0.0-incubating Release
Date Tue, 09 Aug 2016 23:39:22 GMT
To be concrete:  up thread was mention of shm.c

I found two shm.c files in the HAWQ repo.  It says it came in as part of
the SGA.  I looked in PostGreSQL's repo, but didn't find shm.c in the same
paths.  So where did HAWQ's shm.c come from?  I think that's what Justin
is asking.

On 8/9/16, 4:32 PM, "Justin Mclean" <justin@classsoftware.com> wrote:

>Hi,
>
>> Why? It would be perfectly fine for PG project to include, lets say an
>>MIT
>> source code.
>
>That would be compatible with our license. But what if they included GPL
>or CDDL licensed software?
>
>> That's why I don't feel comfortable putting the overall PG  licensed
>>header there on my own.
>
>Nor should you if the files are not licensed that way.
>
>> I think we're talking slightly past each other -- I told you I do KNOW
>>that they
>> are licensed under the different ALv2 compatible license.
>
>The package as a whole is licensed that way. But you stated you didn’t
>not know how that file is licensed it may be ALv2 or it may be something
>else. Just as it has different copyright owner it also likely is under a
>different license, whose terms are very likely to be APv2 compatible, but
>may not be.
>
>Thanks,
>Justin
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Mime
View raw message