incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mike Jumper <mike.jum...@guac-dev.org>
Subject Re: Namespacing of subproject Docker images vs. Incubator policy
Date Mon, 29 Aug 2016 15:49:56 GMT
On Aug 29, 2016 8:30 AM, "Roman Shaposhnik" <roman@shaposhnik.org> wrote:
>
> ...
> >> Note that there was a separate discussion focused on where is the right
> >> place for nightly/snapshot Docker builds to be deposited to.
> >>
> >> Sadly, that discussion bore no fruit :-(
> >>
> >
> > Was there?  I would love to get discussing about that.  Not for an
> > incubating project but for a TLP.   I share concerns about "latest" but
> > also see benefit to developers being able to use a "LATEST" tagged
> > pre-release.
>
> There was:
https://mail-search.apache.org/members/private-arch/infrastructure/201608.mbox/%3CCA+DCeTG4=yrG8aoj=rvu8o71vjMeUtNDd5cyJKXiaLktxwTBGQ@mail.gmail.com%3E
>
> FWIW, I say that we should just adopt a repository.apache.org approach
> and declare that nightly/snapshot Docker images can only be distributed
> from our own Docker repo. That way there's absolutely 0 chance anybody
> can get them by accident.
>

If the "latest" tag points only to releases, then that would take care of
this as well.

If only a specific "snapshot" tag ever points to snapshot images, then
getting them would require:

$ sudo docker pull foo:snapshot

Zero chance of a user typing that by accident as well.

- Mike

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message