incubator-general mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Pierre Smits <pierre.sm...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Notes on branding
Date Fri, 01 Jul 2016 12:42:37 GMT
John,

It seems to me you just defined a (potential) solution direction.

Best regards,

Pierre

On Friday, July 1, 2016, John D. Ament <johndament@apache.org> wrote:

> Its definitely an option, once we have a clear sign in place.  Just don't
> forget, clutch isn't magic.  Unless we build some smarts that can visit the
> podling page, look at the webpage and see if the incubator logo are
> present, its going to be based on a flag in podlings.xml.  I can actually
> think of a way to do it with Selenium + Sikuli instead of myself going to
> each webpage.
>
> John
>
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 4:00 AM Pierre Smits <pierre.smits@gmail.com
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>
> > Hi John, All,
> >
> > My suggestion is to improve the incubator clutch, so that the overview
> > http://incubator.apache.org/clutch.html reflects whether podlings are:
> >
> >
> >    1. Compliant with ASF Branding regulations
> >    2. Compliant with ASF Incubator Branding regulations.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Pierre Smits
> >
> > ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>
> > OFBiz based solutions & services
> >
> > OFBiz Extensions Marketplace
> > http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 5:49 AM, John D. Ament <johndament@apache.org
> <javascript:;>>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > All,
> > >
> > > As a follow up to this.  I've started tracking a wiki page with the
> > results
> > > of the audit.  You can find it here:
> > > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/BrandingAuditJune2016
> > >
> > > There's two things I want to get out of this.
> > >
> > > - Agreement on our branding.  It seems like there's some notion that
> our
> > > branding rules right now are too lenient.  Do we want to require the
> > > incubator logo? Do we want both artifacts above the fold?
> > >
> > > - Communication to the podlings.  Once all issues are identified, get
> the
> > > list of issues to all offending podlings (which I'm assuming is 90% of
> > them
> > > right now, based on the first 18).  Make sure they fix them prior to
> > (next
> > > release? board report?)
> > >
> > > John
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 7:36 AM Pierre Smits <pierre.smits@gmail.com
> <javascript:;>>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi John,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for keeping up the good work and being adamant/unwavering
> > > regarding
> > > > the branding aspects visavis the podlings.
> > > >
> > > > Best regards,
> > > >
> > > > Pierre Smits
> > > >
> > > > ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>
> > > > OFBiz based solutions & services
> > > >
> > > > OFBiz Extensions Marketplace
> > > > http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 1:36 PM, John D. Ament <
> johndament@apache.org <javascript:;>>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hey guys
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm starting to go through the podlings to identify branding
> issues.
> > > > > Touched the first 12 projects, for those that had websites, 4 were
> > not
> > > > > within branding requirements.
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm not sure if other scan give a hand here on contacting podlings,
> > > but I
> > > > > went through Airflow -> Fineract, and contacted Airflow, Atlas,
> Beam
> > > and
> > > > > Blur.  Otherwise I'll continue to churn through contacting
> projects.
> > > > >
> > > > > John
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>


-- 
Pierre Smits

ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>
OFBiz based solutions & services

OFBiz Extensions Marketplace
http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message